Education (Establishment of Tertiary Education Institutions) Amendment Bill
24 September 2004
Attorney-General
Legal Advice:
Education (Establishment of Tertiary Education Institutions) Amendment Bill 2004:
Consistency With The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990:
- We have considered the Education (Establishment of Tertiary Education Institutions)
Amendment Bill (PCO version 6153/2) for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights
Act 1990 (the "Bill of Rights Act"). We understand that this Bill is to be
considered by Cabinet Policy Committee on Wednesday, 15 September 2004. We have been
asked to consider this Bill under some urgency.
- The Bill proposes to amend the current process for determining the establishment of
tertiary education institutions by establishing a sequential process for making such a
determination. A tertiary education institution is identified as being a college of
education, a polytechnic, a specialist college, a university or a wananga.
- This Bill intends to make it clear that the initial consideration for any
application must be whether the establishment of such an institution is in the interests
of the tertiary education system and the nation as a whole (new section 162A(1)(a)).
This criterion is currently provided for in the Education Act 1989 but is not given any
priority over the other criteria (section 162(3) of the Education Act).
- The Bill also provides that, if the establishment of a new tertiary education
institution is
not
in the interests of the tertiary education system and nation as a whole, the Minister
may decline the application on this basis alone without considering the merits of the
application further (new section 162A(4)). The Bill provides that the Minister must
obtain the advice of the Tertiary Education Commission before making a determination
under section 162A(1)(a) (new section 162A(2)).
- The Bill will have retrospective effect in relation to any Order in Council
establishing a university that may be made after this Bill is introduced into the House
(see clause 5). The explanatory note of the Bill states that it is intended that the
retrospective application would have the effect of encouraging both the Qualifications
Authority and those seeking establishment of a university either to wait until after the
Act comes into force or to follow the new procedures in anticipation of the Bill’s
enactment. We understand that the changes to the process will be applied to one
long-standing application by a tertiary institution for university status.
- We have considered whether this Bill raises issues of consistency with the Bill of
Rights Act, specifically the right to the observance of the principles of natural
justice (section 27(1)). We have come to the view that the Bill appears to be consistent
with the Bill of Rights Act.
- In accordance with your instructions, we attach a copy of this opinion for referral
to the Minister of Justice. We also attach a copy for referral to the Minister of
Education and Associate Minister of Education (Tertiary Education), if you agree.
Roger Palairet
Acting Chief Legal Counsel
Office of Legal Counsel |
Boris van Beusekom
Senior Legal Adviser
Bill of Rights/Human Rights Team |
cc
Minister of Justice
Minister of Education
Associate Minister of Education (Tertiary Education)
In addition to the general disclaimer for all documents on this website, please note
the following: This advice was prepared to assist the Attorney-General to determine
whether a report should be made to Parliament under s 7 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights
Act 1990 in relation to the Education (Establishment of Tertiary Education Institutions)
Amendment Bill. It should not be used or acted upon for any other purpose. The advice does
no more than assess whether the Bill complies with the minimum guarantees contained in the
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. The release of this advice should not be taken to indicate
that the Attorney-General agrees with all aspects of it, nor does its release constitute a
general waiver of legal professional privilege in respect of this or any other matter.
Whilst care has been taken to ensure that this document is an accurate reproduction of the
advice provided to the Attorney-General, neither the Ministry of Justice nor the Crown Law
Office accepts any liability for any errors or omissions.