Report of the Prostitution Law Review Committee on the Operation of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003

Foreword | Acknowledgements | List of Tables | Executive Summary | 1. Introduction | 2. Estimation of the Numbers of Sex Workers in New Zealand | 3 The PRA and Human Rights | 4 Health, Safety and Well-being | 5 Avoiding or Exiting the Sex Industry | 6 The Brothel Operator Certification System | 7 The Use of Under Age People in Prostitution | 8 Street-Based Sex Workers | 9 Response of Territorial Authorities to the PRA | 10 Employment Conditions | 11 Common Misconceptions About Prostitution | 12 Invisibility of Clients | 13 Trafficking | 14 Conclusion and Future Review | References | Appendix 1 Prostitution Law Review Committee Members | Appendix 2 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

Executive Summary

Introduction

This report presents the Prostitution Law Review Committee’s (the Committee) review of the operation of the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 (PRA) three to five years after the Act’s commencement, in June 2003. The purpose of the PRA was to decriminalise prostitution (while not endorsing or morally sanctioning prostitution or its use); create a framework to safeguard the human rights of sex workers and protect them from exploitation; promote the welfare and occupational health and safety of sex workers; contribute to public health; and prohibit the use in prostitution of persons under 18 years of age. The PRA also established a certification regime for brothel operators. This report fulfils the Committee’s obligations to report on specific matters and make recommendations to the Minister of Justice on its findings.

The Committee’s report is research based and draws heavily on the work of the Christchurch School of Medicine (CSOM) and Victoria University’s Crime and Justice Research Centre (CJRC). The CSOM and CJRC reports are available on the Ministry of Justice website: www.justice.govt.nz.

Estimation of the Number of Sex Workers in New Zealand

Baseline estimates of the size of the sex industry were provided in the Committee’s first report, The Nature and Extent of the Sex Industry in New Zealand: An Estimation (2005). To the extent possible, the baseline data is compared with more recent estimates carried out for this report. However, caution must be applied to any estimate of the numbers of people involved in the sex industry. Direct comparisons between pre- and post-decriminalisation figures are possible only for Christchurch where an estimation using comparable methods was undertaken in 1999 (CSOM, 2007).

In the Committee’s first report it was estimated that there were 5,932 sex workers in New Zealand. The current report estimates the number of sex workers to be 2,332 in the areas included in the study. The Committee does not consider that this means the numbers of sex workers in New Zealand have declined by 3600 over five years. Rather, the different estimates are the result of the limitations of the initial data collection methods, and the more robust methodology used to estimate numbers in the current report.

The research divides the industry into three sectors: private indoor workers, street-based sex workers, and managed workers (generally those working in brothels). A 2007 estimation of numbers of sex workers in five centres (Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch, Hawke’s Bay and Nelson) found a total of 2332 sex workers. A comparison between the number of sex workers in Christchurch in 1999 and 2006 shows that the total has stayed approximately the same over that period. The study does not indicate that there has been any increase in the number of street-based sex workers in Christchurch over that period, contrary to some public perceptions.

Accurately counting the number of sex workers remains difficult. However, the Committee endorses the findings of the CSOM that the enactment of the PRA has had little impact on the numbers of people working in the sex industry.

The PRA and Human Rights

It is important to determine the exact nature of the human rights that must be safeguarded when considering the human rights aspect of the purpose of the PRA. There is no fundamental human right not to be discriminated against on grounds of occupation.

After considering international human rights to which New Zealand is a signatory, New Zealand case law, and the views of sex workers, the Committee concludes that the PRA safeguards the following rights: the right of those under 18 not to be used in sex work; the right of adults not to be forced to engage in sex work, including the right to refuse a particular client or sexual practice; and the right not to be subject to exploitative, degrading employment practices.

When surveyed by CSOM about their perception of rights protected by the PRA, over 90% of sex workers in each sector felt that they have legal rights under the PRA. Over 60% of sex workers in each sector felt that they were more able to refuse to provide commercial sexual services to a particular client since the enactment of the PRA.

The Committee concludes that the PRA has had a marked effect in safeguarding the right of sex workers to refuse particular clients and practices, chiefly by empowering sex workers through removing the illegality of their work. The Committee is very concerned that it appears there are still some managed sex workers who are being required by brothel operators to provide commercial sexual services against their will on occasion.

Health, Safety and Well-being of Sex Workers

Both the CSOM and CJRC reported high use of condoms throughout the industry. However, this was not necessarily due to the legal prohibition on the provision of unsafe commercial sexual services. Many said that they had always practised safe sex. It was generally felt that most sex workers had already adopted such practices as a result of the effective HIV/AIDS prevention campaign that was established in the late 1980s. Studies show a very low rate of HIV/AIDS incidence amongst sex workers.

The PRA brought the sex industry under the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992. Research indicates that there is a high level of awareness of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) requirements in the sex industry, but compliance cannot be measured as there is no system of regular inspections of brothels by Medical Officers of Health, and the Department of Labour.

The majority of sex workers interviewed felt that the PRA could do little about violence that occurred, though a significant minority thought that there had been an improvement since the enactment of the PRA. Of those feeling in a position to comment, the majority felt sex workers were now more likely to report incidents of violence to the Police, though willingness to carry the process through to court is less common.

Avoiding or Exiting the Sex Industry

Research identified a combination of push and pull factors at play of people entering, remaining and exiting the sex industry. The most common reason for entering the industry across all sectors is financial. Around 93% of sex workers surveyed by CSOM cited money as a reason for both entering and staying in the sex industry. The most effective way to ensure people do not enter the sex industry is to help them find other means of earning money. Second, exiting the industry is difficult, and often involves several attempts. Third, by no means all sex workers want to exit, and some sex workers find it offensive that they should be being offered assistance to leave a job where they are quite happy. There are as many reasons for exiting as there are reasons for entering the sex industry and a ‘one size fits all’ approach to support and assistance in exiting will not be appropriate.

Despite the perception that most sex workers are coerced into entering the sex industry, only a very small number of sex workers reported being made to work by someone else at the time of entry and after (an average of 3.9% across the three sectors).

The most significant barriers to exiting are loss of income, reluctance to lose the flexible working hours available in the sex industry, and the camaraderie and sense of belonging that some sex workers describe.

The CJRC was commissioned by the Committee to provide a model of best practice for assisting sex workers to exit the industry. The Committee recommends that this practice be adopted in New Zealand. There is currently little dedicated support available for those wishing to exit the sex industry. The Committee recommends that central government make available adequate funding for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to provide a range of services to the sex industry, including assistance with exiting for those who wish to exit.

The Brothel Operator Certification System

The Committee was charged with considering whether the brothel certification regime is effective or could be improved, whether any other agency or agencies could or should administer it, and whether a system is needed for identifying the location of businesses of prostitution.

The Committee recommends that the eligibility criteria for holding a certificate be maintained, with the addition of a criterion that a certificate holder must be willing to facilitate inspections. The Department of Labour should be the lead agency to manage the inspection of brothels. Information about good employment practices and where to obtain further advice and support should be supplied with brothel operators’ certificates. The register should continue to be administered by the Auckland District Court, and there need not be a requirement to link certificates to businesses. Certificates should remain valid for three years from issue.

The Use of Under Age People in Prostitution

The PRA makes it an offence to arrange for or to receive, or to facilitate or receive payment for, commercial sexual services from a person under 18. The offences carry a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment. It is not an offence for a person under the age of 18 to provide commercial sexual services.

The Committee considers that the threshold of 18 years should remain. The existing threshold acknowledges the vulnerability of people used in under age prostitution and recognises that there is a difference between commercial sexual activity and other sexual activity. The Committee also believes that the PRA should remain consistent with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Labour Organisation Convention 182.

The CSOM survey found that under age people used in prostitution made up 1.3% of the total number of sex workers surveyed. The Committee does not consider the PRA has increased under age involvement in prostitution. The Committee believes the passage of the PRA has raised awareness of the problem of under age prostitution, and that this is a positive consequence. A very small percentage of young people who are sexually active are active in the context of prostitution. Further, few young people who can generally be termed ‘at risk’ are involved in prostitution.

The Committee is concerned that 17 year olds ‘fall between the cracks’ in terms of government support, being too old to be eligible for assistance from Child Youth and Family Services, and to young to be eligible for income support. The Committee was advised that the Independent Youth Benefit (IYB), available to 17 year olds in certain circumstances, is difficult for some young people to access. The Committee recommends that the Ministry of Social Development develop strategies to assist at risk young people in accessing the financial support they are entitled to.

Street-Based Sex Workers

The Committee endorses the findings of the CSOM study that ‘the numbers of street-based sex workers have remained stable since the enactment of the PRA, with comparable numbers on the streets to estimates done prior to decriminalisation’. The CSOM survey found that the street-based sector made up 11% of the sex industry in 2006, making it by far the smallest sector.

Complaints about street-based sex workers have predominantly been made about the Christchurch and Manukau street prostitution areas. The Committee concludes the effects of street-based prostitution can be managed through proactive measures taken by local councils (the provision of lighting and street cleaning), Police (Police presence to discourage disorderly or anti-social behaviour), and NGOs (providing support services). Further, because under age people are more likely to work in the street sector, a Police presence is necessary to discourage clients seeking contact with under age people. Such Police action should be used in conjunction with other child protection measures.

The Committee considers that the purpose of the PRA, particularly in terms of promoting the welfare and occupational health and safety of sex workers, cannot be fully realised in the street-based sector. The Committee recognises the danger street work poses to sex workers, and acknowledges the concern and upset it causes communities. The Committee considers street-based sex workers should be encouraged to either move to a safer, indoor setting, or leave sex work altogether.

Response of Territorial Authorities to the PRA

The Committee surveyed territorial authorities (TAs) on the impact of the PRA. Most had no problems with the sex industry in their district, and had received few complaints about it.

The Committee is concerned that some TAs have attempted to force small owner-operated brothels (SOOB) to work in the same area as larger brothels. A SOOB is a brothel in which no more that four sex workers work and each worker retains control over their individual earnings. TA district plans that require brothels to be located in industrial and commercial zones mean sex workers working from SOOBs would be at greater risk of violence and/or robbery, as they may not have the security arrangements that a larger brothel has. In the Committee’s view, a SOOB should be regulated in the same manner as any other business run from home, that is, by general rules provided for in a district plan regarding home-based employment.

The Committee considers that legislating for nationwide rules as to the location of brothels would be inappropriate. Each locale has its own needs and considerations. The management of the sex industry in each district is best left to the TAs, who can most effectively respond to the needs of their communities consistent with the aims of the PRA.

Employment Conditions for Sex Workers

Prior to the enactment of the PRA, the illegal status of the sex industry meant that sex workers were open to coercion and exploitation by managers, pimps, and clients.

Research indicates that there has been some improvement in employment conditions, but this is by no means universal. Generally, brothels which had treated their workers fairly prior to the enactment of the PRA continued to do so, and those which had unfair management practices continued with them.

The Committee considers it would be inappropriate for it to make a declaration on what the employment status of all brothel-based sex workers should be. This is, and should be, a matter of choice for individual sex workers and brothel operators, with disputes to be dealt with through the employment resolution processes and the courts. Some workers would prefer the benefits and certainty of employee status, others the freedom and flexibility of independent contractor status. The enactment of the PRA has empowered sex workers by removing the taint of criminality from their occupation, and part of that empowerment is to take control of their employment relationships.

The Committee recommends that the sex industry, with the help of the Department of Labour and others, moves towards written, best practice employment contracts (either ‘of service’ or ‘for service’) becoming standard for sex workers working in brothels. This would strengthen the human rights, employment conditions, health and safety, and well-being of sex workers that the PRA foreshadows.

List of the Committee’s Recommendations

Estimation of the Number of Sex Workers in New Zealand (Chapter 2)

The PRA and Human Rights (Chapter 3)

Health, Safety and Well-being (Chapter 4)

Avoiding or Exiting the Sex Industry (Chapter 5)

The Brothel Operator Certification System (Chapter 6)

The Use of Under Age People in Prostitution (Chapter 7)

Street-Based Sex Workers (Chapter 8)

Response of Territorial Authorities to the PRA (Chapter 9)

Employment Conditions (Chapter 10)