Figures
Figure 1.1: Percentage of prosecuted cases involving imprisonable offences resulting in each outcome, 1986-97
Figure 3.1: Relationship between the average seriousness score (on the y-axis) and selected variables, 1995
Figure 4.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a prison sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 4.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving a prison sentence, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 4.3 The percentage of proved cases resulting in a prison sentence for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 4.4: Comparison among years of the actual and predicted probabilities of imprisonment, with predictions made using the 1995 model
Figure 4.5: Actual percentage receiving imprisonment and predicted percentage based on 1995 sentencing practice, by offence seriousness and previous conviction history, 1983-1995
Figure 5.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a prison sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 5.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving a suspended sentence, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 6.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a periodic detention sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 6.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving periodic detention, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 6.3: The percentage of proved cases resulting in a periodic detention sentence for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 6.4: Comparison among years of the actual and predicted probabilities of periodic detention, with predictions made using the 1995 model
Figure 6.5: Actual percentage receiving periodic detention and predicted percentage based on 1995 sentencing practice, by offence seriousness and previous conviction history, 1983-1995
Figure 7.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a community service sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 7.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving community service, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 7.3: The percentage of proved cases resulting in, a community service sentence for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 7.4: Comparison among years of the actual and predicted probabilities of community service, with predictions made using the 1995 model
Figure 7.5: Actual percentage receiving community service and predicted percentage based on 1995 sentencing practice, by offence seriousness and previous conviction history, 1983-1995
Figure 8.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a community programme sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 8.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving community programme, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 8.3: The percentage of proved cases resulting in community programme for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 9.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a supervision sentence in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 9.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving supervision, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 9.3: The percentage of proved cases resulting in a supervision sentence for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 9.4: Comparison among years of the actual and predicted probabilities of supervision, with predictions made using the 1995 model
Figure 9.5: Actual percentage receiving supervision and predicted percentage based on 1995 sentencing practice, by offence seriousness and previous conviction history, 1983-1995
Figure 10.1: Percentage of offenders receiving a monetary penalty in 1995 for selected variables
Figure 10.2: Plot of the predicted probability versus the actual proportion of offenders receiving a monetary penalty, 1995 fitted and test data
Figure 10.3: The percentage of proved cases resulting in a monetary penalty for imprisonable offences, 1982-1997
Figure 10.4: Comparison among years of the actual and predicted probabilities of receiving a monetary penalty, with predictions made using the 1995 model
Figure 10.5: Actual percentage receiving a monetary penalty and predicted percentage based on 1995 sentencing practice, by offence seriousness and previous conviction history, 1983-1995
Figure 11. 1: Percentage of proved cases resulting in each type of sentence at five levels of offence seriousness, 1995
Figure 11.2: Plot of the predicted probability of receiving a prison sentence versus the actual proportion receiving a prison sentence and the number of offenders at each level of probability
