Tables

Table 6.1 Population, sample and response rate of each respondent group

Table 6.2 Number and percentage of respondents of each professional group

Table 6.3 Number and percentage of respondents from each region

Table 6.4 Ethnicity of respondents

Table 6.5 How long respondents had spent in their current role

Table 6.6 Number and percentage of respondents who had previously been involved in cases where section 16 was used

Table 6.7 Number of cases respondents had been involved in during the last year where section 16 was used

Table 6.8 When was the most recent case that respondents had been involved in?

Table 6.9 Ethnicity and gender of offender in most recent case

Table 6.10 Ethnicity of offenders in most recent case reported by region

Table 6.11 Most serious offence in most recent case

Table 6.12 Type of offender in the most recent case

Table 6.13 Role of presenter in most recent case

Table 6.14 Role of person who organised the section 16 submission in most recent case

Table 6.15 Reason for use of section 16 in most recent case

Table 6.16 Most serious sentence imposed in most recent case

Table 6.17 Perceived effect of using section 16 in most recent case

Table 6.18 Is section 16 used as often as it could be?

Table 6.19 The main reason that section 16 is not used as often as it could be

Table 6.20 Who should be responsible for organising use of section 16?

Table 6.21 What is the main purpose of section 16?

Table 6.22 Is section 16 used as effectively as it could be?

Table 6.23 How could section 16 be made more effective?

Table 6.24 Should changes be made to the section 16 legislation?

Table 6.25 What changes should be made to the section 16 legislation?