Ministry of Justice >> Courts >> Youth Court >> Youth Court Decisions >> Case Summary
Brown v The Attorney-General & District Court at Kaikohe [1993] BCL 1782 Fisher JName: Brown v Attorney-General & District Court at Kaikohe Summary: Application for judicial review regarding the circumstances in which sexual complainants should be required to give oral evidence at preliminary hearings under s185C of the Summary Proceedings Act 1957. Defendant charged with sexual violation by rape; remanded for a preliminary hearing; applied for an order pursuant to s185C(b)(ii) Summary Proceedings Act that the complainants evidence be given orally and that she be made available for cross-examination; application declined. Applicant alleges that Judges decision was vitiated by error of law in that he misapplied the discretion conferred upon him under s185C of the Summary Proceedings Act. Summary of manner in which discretion under s185C should be exercised outlined: W v Attorney-General; P v District Court at Wellington (1992) 8 CRNZ 427 (CA). Decision: No error of law. No special circumstances exist to require complainant to give evidence. Application declined. |
||||||||||
Top | Home | Publications | Ministry of Justice | Courts | Judiciary | Fines | Fees | Practice Notes | Vacancies | Tribunals | Media Releases | About Judgments | Addresses & Contacts | Disclaimer | newzealand.govt.nz |