Ministry of Justice >> Courts >> Youth Court >> Youth Court Decisions >> Case Summary
Police v C (21 December 2000) YC, Auckland, CRN 0204004234-36, Simpson DCJName: Police v C Summary: Cs FGC delayed as Police provided insufficient details of victims address; whether time limit set out in s249(4)(b) CYPFA is a mandatory time limit. Section 249(2) creates a mandatory time limit and failure to convene within 21 days invalidates the FGC and therefore removes the jurisdiction of the Court to consider the Information before it: H v Police [1999] NZFLR 996, Smellie J. Held: No basis for distinguishing the decision in H v Police. Wording in s249(4)(b) and s249(2) sufficiently similar even though time periods for convening FGCs are different. Court satisfied that Youth Justice Co-ordinator not given adequate information and not able to give notice to the victim who was an entitled person. Repeated requests to the Police for further information failed to yield other details. Decision: No jurisdiction; Informations dismissed |
||||||||||
Top | Home | Publications | Ministry of Justice | Courts | Judiciary | Fines | Fees | Practice Notes | Vacancies | Tribunals | Media Releases | About Judgments | Addresses & Contacts | Disclaimer | newzealand.govt.nz |