Ministry of Justice >> Courts >> Youth Court >> Youth Court Decisions >> Case Summary
Police v WMT (28 July 2006, YC, Hastings, CRI 2005-220-53; CRI 2006-220-7; CRI 2006-220-60) Judge WatsonName: Police v WMT Section 284(1); thirteen factors from Judge Harvey in Police v James (A Young Person) [1991] 8 FRNZ considered. Judge particularly noted seriousness of offending, history of offending, no victim empathy and that WMT had already been in a custodial situation for 4 months. Noted rehabilitative options available in the YC and that WMT’s age weighed heavily in his favour. Family willing but unable to offer assistance and Australian whanau’s offer to have WMT live with them not feasible until after sentence served. Victim traumatised and wishing to see WMT imprisoned. Court concerned about number of serious violent youth offenders appearing before it; where there are instances of serious gratuitous violence, sentences of imprisonment must be imposed. Decision: Section 4, s208 CYPF Act principles - sentence of supervision with residence followed by structured sentence of supervision for 6 months. Rehabilitative option would produce a more positive outcome for the community in the long-term. |
||||||||||
Top | Home | Publications | Ministry of Justice | Courts | Judiciary | Fines | Fees | Practice Notes | Vacancies | Tribunals | Media Releases | About Judgments | Addresses & Contacts | Disclaimer | newzealand.govt.nz |