Ministry of Justice >> Courts >> Youth Court >> Youth Court Decisions >> Case Summary
R v ZF (26 October 2006, YC, Napier, CRI-2006-241-113) Judge BecroftName: R v ZF Z’s unblemished character, that he is a capable and talented person (had saved a swimmer from treacherous seas), family support and Youth Justice principles dictated that Z be given a second chance. This must be balanced against seriousness of offending, pre-meditation, effect on victim; parity, fairness, consistency with other offenders and fact that Z intimately involved and the public interest. Decision: Z to be convicted and transferred to the DC but as per X v Police (HC, Auckland, CRI 2004-404-374, 11/2/06), three comments made for the DC’s information - (i) strong mitigating factor that all 3 offenders had no offending history, (ii) HC conflict as to application of youth justice principles in the DC but Judge’s view that it is insufficient for Z to be sentenced using adult tariff and subtracting additional prison time because of youth. Adult Courts must grapple with developmental immaturity of young people; teenagers must be dealt with in qualitatively different way: Roper v Simmons (1 March 2005) 543 US; (iii) if sentenced to a period of imprisonment of under 2 years may be eligible for home detention. |
||||||||||
Top | Home | Publications | Ministry of Justice | Courts | Judiciary | Fines | Fees | Practice Notes | Vacancies | Tribunals | Media Releases | About Judgments | Addresses & Contacts | Disclaimer | newzealand.govt.nz |