Search Results

1. AB v FT LCRO 008/2015 (30 June 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING A determination of the [City] Standards Committee BETWEEN Mr and Mrs AB Applicants AND Mr FT Respondent DECISION Introduction [1] In an application filed on 13 January 2015 Mr and Mrs AB have sought a review of a determination of the [City] Standards Committee to take no further action on their complaint against [City] barrister, Mr FT. The complaint concerned Mr FT’s conduct as Mr and M...

2. TU v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 67 (8 October 2013) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...that it was unfortunate that the Authority has “either limited or no knowledge at all in respect of [the] behaviour and conduct” of persons of that nationality. [24.3] The Authority was deliberately encouraging persons of that nationality to file “what are clearly trivial and damaging allegations on one’s reputation, by accepting their allegations as complaints.” [24.4] The Authority should reject this and similar complaints as trivial. [24.5] The complaint is not a complain...

3. [2018] NZEmpC 67 Wendco (NZ) Ltd v Unite Inc [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...plaintiff P Cranney and S Meikle, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 12 June 2018 REASONS FOR ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL: APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM INJUNCTION Introduction [1] Late last week Wendco (NZ) Ltd (Wendco) filed an application for urgency and for an interim injunction against Unite Inc. (Unite), a Union whose members are employed by Wendco in its 23 restaurants. [2] An urgent hearing was timetabled for hearing on Friday, 8 June 2018, on...

4. ENV-2016-AKL-000197 Adams v Auckland Council [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...environmental protection and reduces amenity. The plan is overly complex and cumbersome and its adminitsration will result in waste of resources and have serious impact on the economy, the natural environment and the built environment. I have not attached any files and will submit documents to support my submission manually as the files will be too big for the website. I seek the following decision by Council: Decline the Proposed Plan . If the Proposed Plan is not declined, then amend...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 71 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...email, the university had performed the agreement including making payments. [59] Dr Sawyer was not under duress, or coercion, when she signed the settlement agreement. (b) Was the settlement agreement illegal? [60] In her submissions in reply, filed personally despite being represented by counsel, and during Mr Smith’s closing submissions, she placed reliance on the Court’s judgment in 8I Corp v Marino to say a settlement agreement that was illegal could be set aside.19 D...

6. LCRO 150/2017 UG v WN [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...conflict of duties when she later acted for the purchasers of the property from Mr WN; and (3) Ms UG failed to respond to Mr WN's complaint in accordance with her firm's complaints procedures. 4 Application for review [14] Ms UG filed an application for review on 9 August 2017. She seeks a reversal of the Committee’s decision including the orders made by the Committee. Her reasons in support of her application, prepared by counsel acting for her, accompany and for...

7. Te Whare Maire Trust - Lot 5 DP 8663 (2005) 87 Ōpōtiki MB 238 (87 OPO 238) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...that this block is no longer a Maori land block. In fact, Lot 5 OP 8663 GS 50/1373 is a general title block registered under the land transfer system with a certificate of title declaring this to be 31 .0888 hectares. At the time the application was filed, the registered proprietors of this block was Walton Mountain Limited (a registered company with the directors being John Raymond and Janice Fleming of Vanstone Road, RO 2, Opotiki). Walton Mountain Limited entered into an agreement for...

8. Harris v Harris - Mangamuka West 3B2A and East H5B (2001) 28 Auckland MB 167 (28 AT 167) [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...167-1'8 Subject: Mangamuka West 3B2A & East H5B 0 InJunction: Raymond Harrfs v Wiremu Hams Section: 19(I)(a)/93 Chief Judge DECISION Introduction This Is an application described on the papers as an Interim Injunction application. It was filed In the Court in Whangarei on the 4 November 1999. The application was made in respect of four blocks described (or more accurately misdescribed) In the application as Mangamuka H3A CT 160/665; Mangamuka F5A2 CT 17A/840; Mangamuka...

9. [2021] NZREADT 8 - Complaints Assessment Committee 2001 v Sheldon (19 February 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...witnesses were cross-examined. [4] The Tribunal notes the provisions of s 110(1) and (4) of the Act: 1 Ms Williams was referred to in the material before the Committee as “the Mt Eden buyer”. Her identity was not disclosed until evidence was filed in the Tribunal. 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance o...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 006 Bay of Islands Maritime Park Inc v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 694 KB]

    ...or brackish water? • Does the natural wetland include freshwater, brackish water and saltwater within the CMA? • Do our conclusions affect the jurisdiction of the Court to proceed? [8] In accordance with directions, an Affidavit had been filed by Dr Phillipe Gerbeaux, a recognised expert on wetlands both in New Zealand and internationally. No party disputed the contents of his Affidavit and this was accepted by the Court on the basis that no party or the Court had any questi...