Search Results

1. Jones v Registrar of REAA [2019] NZREADT 27 (28 June 2019) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...convictions and sentence of six months home detention in relation to tax offences. The Registrar is not satisfied that Mr Jones is a fit and proper person to hold a licence. Further evidence [11] An affidavit sworn by Mr Jones on 24 May 2019 was filed with Mr Eaton’s written submissions. Among other things, Mr Jones stated that Inland Revenue had charged his father with tax offences, and that his father’s affidavit, in which he stated that he was the only individual responsi...

2. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...punishment. COMPLAINT Complaint to Authority [25] On 25 August 2014, the complainant made a formal complaint against Ms Hu to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). According to the complainant, Ms Hu had spoken to her only once before filing the application and that was on 21 April 2013. She did not provide an authoritative explanation of the LTBV. [26] The Authority wrote to Ms Hu on 17 January 2016 formally advising her of the complaint and summarising the deta...

3. INZ (Gilray) v Singh [2019] NZIACDT 53 (29 July 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...agreement to the client … 19. A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that a written agreement contains: … e. a full description of the services to be provided by the adviser, which must be tailored to the individual client. … File management 26. A licensed immigration adviser must: … b. confirm in writing to the client when applications have been lodged, and make on-going timely updates … [51] The first three heads of complaint are inter-connected and w...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 166 New Zealand Resident Doctors Assoc v Auckland District Health Board [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...“Employment Court of New Zealand Practice Directions” <www.employmentcourt.govt.nz> at No 16. endeavour to agree costs. If there is any disagreement as to the calculation of costs to be paid by the NZRDA, the defendants may file and serve a memorandum within 21 days of the date of this judgment. NZRDA then is to file and serve its memorandum in response within a further 21 days with any reply from the defendants to be filed and served within 7 days thereafter....

5. Tom De Pelsemaeker - Evidence in reply to supplementary evidence of TA's (21 May 2021) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express. Scope of supplementary evidence in reply 4 The scope of my supplementary evidence in reply is limited to my response to the supplementary evidence of the Territorial Authorities filed on 12 May 2021, including the matters of fact to be addressed in evidence and issues for planning witnesses set out in the Joint Memorandum of Counsel identifying issues relevant to community water supplies.1 Matters of fact to be add...

6. Tom De Pelsemaeker - Evidence in reply to supplementary evidence of TA's (21 May 2021) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...that might alter or detract from the opinions that I express. Scope of supplementary evidence in reply 4 The scope of my supplementary evidence in reply is limited to my response to the supplementary evidence of the Territorial Authorities filed on 12 May 2021, including the matters of fact to be addressed in evidence and issues for planning witnesses set out in the Joint Memorandum of Counsel identifying issues relevant to community water supplies.1 Matters of fact to be add...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 083 Director-General of Conservation v Thames- Coromandel District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...CONSERVATION (ENV-2016-AKL-149) Appellant THAMES-CORO MANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook Commissioner R M Bartlett Commissioner K Prime Hearing: On the papers Last case event: Legal submissions filed in February 2021 Date of Draft Decision: 17 June 2021 Date of Issue: 17 June 2021 DRAFT DECISION ON s293 RMA PROCESS AFTER PRIMARY DECISION ON APPEAL Decision A: Indicative decision on the evidence and submissions of parties...

8. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Hong [2020] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...DECISION 10 February 2020 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the applicant The respondent in person 2 DECISION OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL CONCERNING LIABILITY Introduction [1] The applicant has filed three charges against the respondent. Charge One relates to conduct that occurred before 1 August 2008 and is brought under s 351(1) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). He was also charged in the alternative with condu...

9. LCRO 122/2018 ZQ v VX (30 October 2018) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...stayed, until the client’s complaint is resolved. [19] When no further contact was made by Mr ZQ or any lawyer acting on his behalf, and nothing was heard from the LSCS, [Law firm] issued proceedings in the District Court. Those proceedings were filed in December 2017. [20] Shortly after, Mr ZQ lodged his complaint. When advice was received of Mr ZQ’s complaint, [Law firm] stayed the District Court proceedings. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [21] Mr Z...

10. [2021] NZACC 67 - BH v ACC (27 April 2021) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...(developmental language issues) that subsequent symptoms of a psychotic disorder are also, on the basis of probability, associated with traumatic brain injury. [31] The Corporation instructed Dr Kritzinger, Psychiatrist, to provide a report based on a file review of the reports from Drs Newburn and Mullen. [32] Amongst other things, Dr Kritzinger says: In large case controlled population based studies, the risk of schizophrenia following brain injury was not significantly rais...