Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 189 Kirby v The NZ China Friendship Society [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...occurred, he says he did not initially consider he could establish that he was an employee, and so did not raise a claim to that effect until he received advice at a Citizens’ Advice Bureau in late 2014 that he should do so. He then filed his claim in the Authority; he contends the Authority reached the wrong conclusion. [6] The case for the Society is that it has acted as a facilitator for the provision of teachers to SBS over many years. Although the Society assists su...

2. Stanley & Anor as trustees of the Lucy Stanley Family Trust v North Shore City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...[3] Ms Stanley has not completed the remedial work and is basing her claim on the estimated remedial cost of $250,000, general damages of $40,000 and consequential and other costs of $95,953.75. REMOVAL OF PARTIES [4] Claims were also filed against Trevor Webster the roofer and Ross Jones, Ms Stanley’s former partner. After the written evidence had been filed Mr Webster applied to be removed as he considered there was no evidence implicating his work in the leaks to the...

3. Biel v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...our view it was not an error of law for the lower Court to refer to the Court order dated 29 November 2001. [29] Section 55(3) of the Act provides that the Māori Appellate Court is not prevented from “referring to any record or other document filed or held in the records of the Court although that record or document may not have been produced or referred to at the earlier hearing.” 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 543 [30] The same principle applies in the Māori Land Cour...

4. Owen v Hauiti - Kiwinui A (2016) 57 Tairawhiti MB 70 (57 TRW 70) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...held on 2 February 2015. 10 Mr Leo Watson appeared on behalf of Wahapeka Hauiti and the descendants of Hirau Karaka in opposition to the application. At the conclusion of that hearing, I adjourned the application and directed both counsel to file evidence in chief and replies. [17] The final hearing was held on 24 April 2015, following which I invited counsel to file closing submissions upon receipt of the Court minutes. 11 Those submissions took a number of months to be file...

5. [2017] NZEnvC 184 Cabra Rural Developments Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Decision: 3 November 2017 Date of Issue: ORAL DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: This case is adjourned and is to be heard as part of or at the conclusion of the sUbstantive case, to be heard beginning 19 March 2018. B: The parties are to file, by 5.00pm, Friday 24 November 2017, a concise statement of the provisions they wish to have inserted within the Plan. The text should be based on the version that the Council is now proposing with tracked changes striking out the parts...

6. TC vs Mr & Mrs SH LCRO 234/2014 [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...hearing was reconvened on the 4 November 2015, and commenced with Mr and Mrs SH being provided with a comprehensive summary of the arguments advanced on behalf of Mr TC at the earlier hearing. [78] In addition, I record that all written submissions filed by the parties, including the submissions filed by Mr TC’s counsel at the initial hearing have been considered. Analysis Discussion [79] At its heart, this is a complaint about Mr TC’s fees. That complaint has arisen becaus...

7. Family Legal Advice Service operational policy version 1.4 [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...Clients seeking funded legal assistance for just completing court entry forms may access the full Family Legal Advice Service, subject to them meeting financial eligibility requirements. If an application for a parenting or guardianship order is filed in the Family Court, the service is available to assist the respondent (if eligible) to prepare a notice of response. More detail as to the specific breakdown of tasks within each activity can be found in Appendix 5. Not included as par...

8. [2021] NZEnvC 023 Gibbston Vines Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...expert. His uncontested opinion, based on his review of soil and geological map information and his on-site soil assessment for Gibbston Valley and the Site, is that there are no :rvielanic Soils present at the Site. After Dr Hill's evidence was filed, QLDC sought capacity to call further expert evidence on the broader issues of high class soils. QLDC's request was declined.8 We accept Dr Hill's evidence. Therefore, we find that this issue has been satisfactorily addr...

9. Impact summary RIA Extended Control Orders [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The_Terrorism_Acts_in_2017.pdf https://terrorismlegislationreviewer.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The_Terrorism_Acts_in_2017.pdf https://www.inslm.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/control-preventative-detention-orders.pdf https://www.inslm.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/control-preventative-detention-orders.pdf Impact Summary Template | 7 to select committee on the Terrorism Suppr...

10. 2020-02-19 Richard Allibone Reply [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...proposed minimum flow site. 16 49 For water ways with no models or for which there are insufficient models to represent the river additional modelling will be required. 50 To update the existing models, ORC needs to source the model data files. Habitat models from the Golder Associates reports are available on the ORC computer network but the NIWA data files have to be sourced from the NIWA archive and this requires some knowledge of the likely location of the data in...