Search Results

Search results for NZEmpC 115 A labour inspector.

56 items matching your search terms

  1. [2013] NZEmpC 28 Maori Hill & Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd v O’Sullivan [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...Plaintiff AND SIRAYA O'SULLIVAN Defendant CRC 24/11 AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MAORI HILL & BALMACEWEN PHARMACY LTD Plaintiff AND LABOUR INSPECTOR (JO-ANNE DUFF) Defendant CRC 28/11 AND IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MAORI HILL AND BALMACEWEN PHARMACY LIMITED Plaintiff AND L...

  2. [2021] NZEmpC 84 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Jeet Holdings Ltd [pdf, 555 KB]

    A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v JEET HOLDINGS LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 84 [9 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 84 EMPC 31/2018 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards, application for declarations of breach and other orders AND IN THE MATTER OF EMPC 104/2018 EMPC 154/2018 proceedings removed

  3. [2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]

    DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v JUSTIN CAMPBELL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 [17 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 213 CRC 2/14 IN THE MATTER OF the referral of a question of law from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DOUGLAS KARL HIXON (LABOUR INSPECTOR) First Plaintiff AND MARCIA JOY COLLINS Second Plaintiff AND JUSTIN CAMPBELL First Defendant AND DEAN EGG...

  4. 2017 Decisions of public interest

    From time to time the Court decides cases that have general importance for practitioners of employment law as well as for the particular parties. These will include some judgments of the full Court and others examining and applying new law. 2017 [2017] NZEmpC 164 New Zealand Public Service Assoc Te Pukenga Here Tikanga Mahi v Commissioner and Chief Executive Inland Revenue Department Te Tari Taake (Judgment of Judge B A Corkill, 21 December 2017) REPRESENTATION –whether defendant breached ss 3...

  5. [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [pdf, 598 KB]

    ...involved two issues arising from proceedings brought under s 11 of the Wages Protection Act 1983 to recover unlawful deductions made by the employer, a company, from wages due to its employees. The company was in liquidation. One issue was whether a Labour Inspector was entitled to bring recovery proceedings. The other issue was whether the extended definition of employer in s 2 of that Act entitled a Labour Inspector (and/or an employee) to bring those proceedings against persons w...

  6. [2020] NZEmpC 63 Southern Taxis Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 518 KB]

    SOUTHERN TAXIS LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR [2020] NZEmpC 63 [14 May 2020 ] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 63 EMPC 249/2018 EMPC 187/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SOUTHERN TAXIS LIMITED First Plaintiff AND MAUREEN VALERIE GRANT Second Plaintiff AND RONALD JAMES GRANT

  7. [2023] NZEmpC 89 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 787 KB]

    A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v PRISHA’S HOSPITALITY (2017) LIMITED TRADING AS ROYAL CAMBRIDGE INDIAN RESTAURANT [2023] NZEmpC 89 [16 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 89 EMPC 450/2019 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards – applications for exercise of powers under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 200...

  8. [2014] NZEmpC 137 Pollard Contracting Ltd v Donald [pdf, 130 KB]

    ...Defendant have agreed to the following statement of facts: 1. The Plaintiff company employed the Defendant on 23 May 2011. 2. The Plaintiff provided the Defendant with an individual employment agreement which was taken from the (then) Department of Labour website ‘employment agreement builder.’ 3. The individual employment agreement contained a plain language explanation of how employment relationship problems may be resolved, consistent with section 65 (2) (vi) of the Emp...

  9. [2021] NZEmpC 199 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 415 KB]

    REEGAN PAORA LAWTON v STEEL PENCIL HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) [2021] NZEmpC 199 [18 November 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZEmpC 199 EMPC 78/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN REEGAN PAORA LAWTON Plaintiff AND STEEL PENCIL HOLDINGS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) First Defendant AN

  10. GSTech Ltd v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 283 KB]

    GSTECH LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 127 [31 October 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2018] NZEmpC 127 EMPC 372/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN GSTECH LIMITED Plaintiff AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, IN