14889 items matching your search terms
...application, stressing that they are not a comprehensive list of relevant factors in the exercise: 8 6 [2010] NZEmpC 50. 7 (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (HC) at [9]. The judgment of Hammond J was upheld on appeal in Bilgoa Enterprises Ltd v Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (CA). 8 At [5]. If no stay is granted, whether the applicant’s right of appeal will be ineffectual; whether the appeal is brought and...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2014] NZREADT 12 READT 038/13 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DAVID GRAY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20008) First respondent AND MALCOLM FORSYTH Second respondent MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Mr J Gaukrodger - Member HEARD at ROTORUA on 21 January 2014 DATE OF DECI...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 90 READT 019/15 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GRAEME WILLSON of Pukekohe, Real Estate Agent Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (per CAC 301) First respondent AND AMANDA BOYD and TERRENCE MACKEL Second respondents MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Judge P F Barber - Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger - Member Ms N Dangen - Member...
...the recent decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in McGraddie v McGraddie.3 [7] The jurisprudence relied on by Mr Hill is conventional and well established. It has developed, however, in the courts of general jurisdiction in relation to appeals. An election under s 179 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) to challenge a determination of the Authority is not an appeal. As the full Court explained in Koia v Carlyon Holdings Ltd: 4 (a) The Court's role...
...1 Now £702. 3 [9] The appellant sought a review of decision. The matter was reviewed internally and by a Benefits Review Committee. The Benefits Review Committee upheld the decision of the Chief Executive. The appellant then appealed to the Authority. [10] The appellant says that he has significant medical and disability-related costs that he must meet himself. This has particularly been the case since he ceased to receive Supported Living Payment because at that...
...scope of review [13] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...
16 Whanganui Appellate Court MB 88 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT Hearing: Coram: A20080002491 APPEAL 2008/84 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal by Miria Pomare and others pursuant to section 58 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 against the decision of the Maori Land Court dated 24 December 2007 and 17 November 2008 in respect of the lands known as Hongoeka 7 Block and Lots 2 & 3 DP 42094 BETWEEN AN...
...[2015] NZERA Auckland 328. 3 Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [2015] NZEmpC 208; Caffe Coffee (NZ) Ltd v Farrimond [2015] NZEmpC 221. [7] Both parties referred to the well established costs principles which were set out in the Court of Appeal judgments of Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee; 4 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd 5 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly. 6 [8] Under these principles, a 66 per cent contribution to the reasonable costs as determined by...
...action on his complaint about Ms [MA] and Mr [RO] (the lawyers), both of [MA] Law (the firm). Background [2] On 21 February 2012 Mr [HL] instructed the lawyers to pursue a review of an ACC decision. He also instructed them to consider a consequent appeal to the District Court after his review application was later declined. The essence of Mr [HL]’s complaint is his assertion that the lawyers capped their fees then billed him more than they had agreed to, and that Mr [RO]’s servic...
...made “inadvertent errors” in managing the trust accounts; and (c) principles of natural justice require Committees to provide reasons for their decisions, irrespective of the provisions of s 158 of the Act and the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Orlov v New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZCA 230; and (d) in the absence of the Committee providing reasons for its decision, a Review Officer has no knowledge as to whether the Committee gave sufficient consideration to Mr GM’s...