Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14876 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZACC 32– CJ v ACC (9 March 2022) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 32 ACR 389/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CJ Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 February 2022 Held at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: S Claver for the appellant R William...

  2. [2024] NZEnvC 283 Harbottle Road Residents v Matamata Piako District Council [pdf, 372 KB]

    ...enabling the commencement of the land use consent, subject to some interim changes to the conditions of that consent, “pending further order of the Court”. [4] The hearing of the appeal was then put on hold pending the hearing of a number of appeals to the Matamata-Piako proposed District Plan. Those appeals were resolved in 2005, but this appeal has remained on hold since then. [5] All parties have agreed to settle the appeal by confirming that the interim changes to the lan...

  3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 52/07 General Distributors Ltd v National Distribution Union [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...whether or not the positions held by the employees at Woolworths Manurewa will still be redundant will depend upon the common law tests for redundancy provided in cases such as Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v Wallis [1998] 3 ERNZ 984 and by the Court of Appeal in Auckland Regional Council v Sanson [1999] 2 ERNZ 597. Mr Langton stated those tests were whether a reasonable person would, taking into account the nature, terms and conditions of each position and the characteristics of the empl...

  4. [2012] NZEmpC 156 Newick v Working In Ltd [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...application. 2 High Court rule 15.1 and reg 6(2)(a)(ii) Employment Court Regulations 2000. 3 Attorney-General v Prince and Gardner [1998] 1 NZLR 262 (CA) at 267;Couch v Attorney-General (on appeal from Hobson v Attorney-General) [2008] NZSC 45, [2008] 3 NZLR 725 at [33]. 4 Couch at [33]. 5 Rule 15.1(1)(d). [6] The plaintiff was employed by the defendant company from 15 December 2009. Prior to that time he was...

  5. [2006] NZEmpC AC 53/06 Graham v Crestline Pty Ltd [pdf, 86 KB]

    ...(sic). I appreciate your willingness to talk with me. I hope from our conversation that we have agreed in principle to wrapping this issue up. Dad will sign the appropriate documents to transfer his shares back to you and an agreement to drop the NZ appeal case and claim for court costs in Australia. In return you will drop all legal proceedings against dad in both NZ (i.e. your claim for court costs) and Australia. I have just outlined this proposal to Dad and understandably he nee...

  6. [2018] NZEmpC 88 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 321 KB]

    ...At [9], referring to Day v Whitcoulls Group Ltd [1997] ERNZ 541 at [9] and Stevenson v Hato Paora College [2002] 2 ERNZ 103 at [8]. [12] I also have regard to the general principle summarised by Richmond J in Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applicant for a grant of indulgence...

  7. LA Audit Report 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 [pdf, 401 KB]

    ...records of legal research and hearing preparation, frequent contact with the client (using letters, emails or texts), sound written advice, and detailed file notes about each court event. Final reporting letters would usually set out the client’s appeal rights and explain what occurred. Acceptable (3) results At this level the services provided continued to be of good quality. While isolated issues were found, it was rare for an auditor to observe a significant quality issue and s...

  8. [2021] NZEnvC 113 Minister of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: Decision [2021] NZEnvC 113 IN THE MA TIER OF an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) and Topic 5 Water Quality of the Proposed Northland Regional Plan BETWEEN MINISTER OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-AKL-122) AND AND AND ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-127) MANGAWHAIHARBOUR...

  9. [2022] NZEnvC 198 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 324 KB]

    QTN PDP – TOPIC 2 UCESI v QLDC – INTERIM DECISION 2.14 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 198 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other parties concerning Topic 2 to Stage 1, specifically the mapping of the Clutha River/Mata Au ON...

  10. [2022] NZACC 25 - Teavae v ACC (1 march 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 24 ACR 066/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KERI TEAVAE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 February 2022 Held at: Dunedin/Ōtepoti Appearances: P Sara for the appellant C Light for the respondent Judgment: 1 March 2022...