Search Results

Search results for email.

9753 items matching your search terms

  1. Weber v CAC 20002 & Penrose & Brown's Real Estate [2013] NZREADT 75 [pdf, 62 KB]

    ...and did not make this part of the agency or listing agreement with Browns. [7] His evidence is that the first time he knew that the appellant was concerned about the neighbour making an offer was when the appellant asked him in an 11 October 2010 email. [8] The licensee said that when the appellant asked him who the purchaser was, he immediately spoke to his General Manager who told him to meet with Mr J Brown who, after obtaining instructions from his purchaser client, confirmed th...

  2. Gunning v CAC306 & Ors [2016] NZREADT 23 [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...presented to the tenant countersigned by the landlords with the particular clause deleted. She said that the tenant then signed without realising the deletion had been made and also paid the deposit. Ms Barnaby said the landlords also received an email advising that the tenant had signed. [18] Under cross-examination from the licensee, Ms Barnaby accepted that the contract had been signed prior to 14 March 2014 but put it that the parties were still negotiating and making counterclaim...

  3. S v J LCRO 5 / 2008 (13 February 2009) [pdf, 39 KB]

    ...parties a further opportunity to set out and respond to the complaint. It was also resolved to enquire of Client S’s son whether he wished the complaint to continue. That enquiry was made by letter on 9 December. Client S’s son responded by email on 22 December in the affirmative. 5 [17] Given that it has been concluded that the Standards Committee made errors in reaching its determination, it would be open to require the Standards Committee to inquire into the complai...

  4. [2020] NZIACDT 48 - ED v Registrar (19 November 2020) [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...friend of hers. An undated note from the friend produced to the Tribunal states the appellant sought a refund. The parties did not reach an agreement. 2 Affirmation Yan Wu (20 August 2020), attachment C at 249. 5 [25] The adviser sent an email to the appellant’s friend on 1 October 2019 stating that he would refund $3,450. [26] The friend replied that the appellant believed she was entitled to a full refund but that he might be able to negotiate $5,000, or he would ar...

  5. LCRO 141/2013 TM v DC (7 June 2017) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...had been signed by Mr TM allowing Mr DC to deduct fees from funds in his trust account. He provided copies to Mr TM. 2 Account (21 August 2012). 3 Letter from TM to DC (28 August 2012). 4 Email from DC to TM (29 August 2012). 5 Email from TM to DC (30 August 2012). 4 [17] The vendor did not refund the deposit but did not pursue Mr TM or his companies for breach of contract either. Mr TM’s complaints [18] Mr TM l...

  6. LCRO 42/2018 MF v Standards Committee (10 October 2018) [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...first home buyers, to withdraw funds they respectively held in KiwiSaver accounts, and for those funds to be applied towards the purchase. Mr NB advised Ms MF of these conditions in a 29 September 2016 email. [7] The next day, the mortgage broker emailed Ms MF to say that DEF had agreed (i) to waive the requirement that the KiwiSaver funds be withdrawn and applied to settlement of the purchase and that (ii) this variation involved DEF agreeing to increase its overall lending. [8]...

  7. Delamere v Jiang [2017] NZIACDT 1 (17 February 2017) [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...lodged the application, and bank records. [12.3] On 22 November 2011, Immigration New Zealand declined Ms Wang’s application, due to failure to comply with the 27 October 2011 notice requiring information. [12.4] On 24 November 2011, Mr Jiang emailed Immigration New Zealand saying he had provided the documents Immigration New Zealand sought. However, Immigration New Zealand claimed it had not received the information and Ms Wang should either apply for a visa under section 61...

  8. [2019] NZEmpC 20 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 537 KB]

    ...The Authority was asked to end facilitation and publish its recommendation. When Jacks Hardware responded to the union’s request to the Authority it did not resile from the previous statement, about wanting to return to facilitation. In an email from its counsel to the union’s counsel the company asked whether the union wanted to bring “the entire facilitation process” to an end. The answer was yes. [21] In response to that correspondence the Authority ended the facilit...

  9. LS v MIS [2021] CEIT-2020-0024 [pdf, 387 KB]

    ...how it is to be dealt with in this matter. The evidence is comprised of LS’s evidence, both in his brief and under cross-examination, damage reports, and the records of the communications between LS, EQC, and MIS. These records involve letters, emails, and notes recording phone discussions. [41] The most significant record is the note (the file note) recording a discussion that occurred on 21 August 2015, between LS, and Q, an employee of MIS. MIS says that the file note records...