Search Results

1. DI v VR Ltd [2015] NZDT 865 (10 December 2015) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...payment. [9] AA have also noted that DI was shown the repair for approval before leaving the shop. DI acknowledges that she pulled both pairs of shoes from the bag on collection but she says she pulled them out sole first to check the resoling job which she was happy with and it was not until a few minutes later in the car that she looked at the top side of the boots and saw the damage, at which point she immediately rang AA. [10] The two pieces of evidence she has provided regard...

2. Feng v Zhang [2016] NZIACDT 35 (29 June 2016) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...business associate (who is also her husband) Mr Young, were licensed immigration advisers. They operated their practice through a company named Ancheng International Group Limited. [2.2.2] The complainant, who was in China, engaged her to obtain a job offer, and a work visa for New Zealand. [2.2.3] Ms Zhang led the complainant to believe he had employment in New Zealand as a chef and that his annual income would be $31,200. He paid approximately $24,000 for Ms Zhang’s services; relyi...

3. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 July 2016 - 30 June 2017 [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...$12,915.78 Date Cost ($) (exc GST / inc GST)** Purpose (eg, hosting delegation from China) Nature (what and for how many eg dinner for 5) Total expenses $0.00 Hospitality All hospitality expenses provided by the CE in the context of his/her job to anyone external to the Public Service or statutory Crown entities. Hospitality Offered to Third Parties No information to disclose Local Travel (within City, excluding travel to airport) Gifts and hospitality Date Description ** (...

4. 2020 NZPSPLA 014 [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...well liked and respected for his honesty and hard work”. [10] I agree with these conclusions. I also accept that Mr Fifita has paid a high price for what has happened. He has not only got a serious conviction on his record, but he lost his job following the event. In addition, his COA was suspended on 26 February 2019 so he has been unable to work in the security industry since then. [11] Based on all the evidence before me I am satisfied that Mr Fifita is, despite his dis...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Name Suppressed [2021] NZLCDT 17 (24 May 2021) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...credit card account. The total amount involved was $2,570. The sums were applied to small domestic purchases. [2] Since this matter came to light, Ms E’s response has been exemplary. She immediately admitted her wrongdoing. She quit her job. She co-operated fully with her employer and the Law Society processes. Her evident remorse and her genuine wish to have the matter cleaned up properly indicate that this offending is not her usual mode. She exhibits loyalty to her fo...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 78 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...relaxed prior to the hearing (which is by no means certain), air travel will pose a significant health risk to him and his family. In addition, Mr Alkazaz’s wife is expecting another child; Mr Alkazaz is employed in Dubai and risks losing his job if he takes time off to travel to New Zealand; and he needs to support his family. [3] The defendant accepts that it is unlikely that there will be a return to normal international travel prior to the date of hearing and does not oppose...

7. UT v ET [2016] NZDT 1473 (1 August 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...would be jointly and severally liable to pay NC and KC for the cost of having the work completed. 2. ET failed to move the fence by the deadline. UT now claims reimbursement from ET for the sum of $1,463.75 that she paid another contractor to do the job. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was ET negligent in positioning the fence? Is ET legally prevented from denying that he was negligent in positioning the fence? b) What sum, if any, is ET liable to pay to UT? Was ET negligen...

8. Parata - Waitangi A1A2 (2024) 121 Tairāwhiti MB 199 (121 TRW 199) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Ruatōria 247-256 (44 RUA 247-256). 121 Tairāwhiti MB 201 [6] The concern I expressed about this is that trustees nominated and elected by means such as this might get the impression that, as they were put forward by their own whānau, their job as a trustee is to represent and even protect the interests of their own whānau rather than the interests of all the beneficial owners. It is of course a cornerstone of trust law that every trustee makes decisions with the objective...

9. LS v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 254 (22 March 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...the veranda had already been done by the original roofer and LS did not initially request Q Ltd do any work on the veranda, therefore it was not in the scope of Q Ltd’s estimate. 8. Q Ltd reports that LS approached Q Ltd’s roofer during the job to request work on the veranda and LS was told that it was not in the current scope of work and to contact the office to get an additional estimate, but LS did not do so. 9. Q Ltd states that it has repeatedly requested to meet with LS to...

10. Christchurch Justice & Emergency Services Precinct

    ...defining the southern edge of a more compact and vibrant city centre. An estimated 2,000 people will work in or use the 42,000m2 Precinct daily. At the peak of construction, in early 2017, more than 1,000 workers were on site to complete the job for Canterbury. It is the largest multi-agency government co-location project in New Zealand’s history and the first major public building to be built and opened in Christchurch by the government since the earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. The Pre...

    Located in:

    1. About >
    2. About us >
    3. Our Strategy 2025–2029