CW-v-XD-2015-NZDT-878-4-September-2015 [pdf, 115 KB]
...have direct control over them. For example an employer may sometimes be liable for the actions of an employee. This is not the case here. CW engaged the tree felling company as an independent contractor. He had no say over the way in which the job was done. CW cannot therefore be found liable for the damage to the property. This part of XD’s claim is therefore dismissed. Is CW liable to pay rental for his use of XD’s property? [13] XD said that without his consent, CW’s...