Paul and Clare Dolheguy v CAC303 & Sonia Stott [2015] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 225 KB]
...that the licensee assured them that the driveway fences were on the boundary. Again, the evidence is not to that effect. [9] The appellants say they would not have purchased the property if they had known about the access and boundary issues, as privacy was of the utmost importance to them. [10] Prior to the hearing before us, the licensee stated that she told the appellants that they owned the driveway but that the neighbouring property had a right of way over it. She said that sh...