Search Results

1. 2025 NZPSPLA 063.pdf [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...engaged by Dave and Sione Seve’s employer to investigate suspected thefts from their Auckland warehouse. Ms Murray alleges that TPD’s private investigators who interviewed Dave and Sione Seve are guilty of misconduct because they breached their privacy, misrepresented their authority, and breached professional standards. [2] TPD deny these allegations and say Ms Murray mischaracterises a legitimate investigation into theft with an employment investigation. They also say Ms Murray...

2. Sisley & Anor v CAC 301 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 89 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...unless we make an order for non-publication under s.108 of the Act which commences: "(1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make 1 or more of the following orders …" [11] These orders include non-publication of decisions or names and identifying details. [12] We have often considere...

3. DH v WU LCRO 219 / 2010 (29 June 2011) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...in the present instance, this is not necessarily the case. [44] Ms C has exercised her right to use the front portion of the driveway which serves the Applicant’s unit, and, in the circumstances which have arisen, the potential exists for his privacy to be compromised both in terms of the possibility of vehicles passing his unit, and also his being unable to fence off the “boundary” between the two units. [45] Property rights and privacy are important, and the Applicant was con...

4. LCRO 178/2014 ZO v BV (15 June 2018) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...Zealand Law Society (NZLS) on 6 January 2014. The substance of Ms BV’s complaint was that: (a) the form had been copied as a PDF and provided to Mr RL by Ms QX; (b) she was, in her words, “embarrassed, hurt, angry and disgusted” that her privacy had been breached; and (c) the release of the report had led her to lose faith in victim support; 3 [13] The Committee considered that the single issue raised by the complaint was a consideration as to whether Mr ZO distributed...

5. Proposed amended Auditing and Monitoring Policy [pdf, 811 KB]

   ...correctly applied the funding eligibility test for Family Legal Advice Service  whether the Family Legal Advice Service provider has retained evidence of their client’s identity and financial eligibility, and complied with principles 12(4) of the Privacy Act 1993, and  any other problems with any aspect of the provider’s conduct that the Ministry deems appropriate to check 3 The quality assurance checking process List of providers for assurance checking The Minist...

6. National Register of Maori Incorporations 2018 [xls, 66 KB]

   ...authority of section 279(4) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. Whilst information about individual committee of management members is held by the Court, those names and contact information have been withheld in accordance with the public register privacy principles of the Privacy Act 1993. For more information about individual incorporations you will need to contact your local Māori Land Court. This data is intended to provide general information only. Whilst all reasonable measures ha...

7. LCRO 77/2020 MP v RJ (30 July 2020) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...to be the case, but it is not conclusively established that Mr RJ obtained a document improperly, simply because Mr MP says that was the case. [74] It is not the task of a Review Officer to determine whether Mr RJ’s client breached Mr MP’s privacy. 7 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, r 10. 12 [75] A complaint of that nature must be directed initially to the [Retirement Village A] manag...

8. [2022] NZACC 18 - Carey v ACC (2 February 2022) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...2017 to date of payment and not from 5 July 2002 is wrong in law for the following reasons: (i) The respondent had no statutory right to review the appellant’s working capacity in 2002. (ii) The respondent violated the appellant’s privacy rights by withholding relevant medical information when having the appellant’s working capacity review in 2002. (iii) The respondent carried out an insufficient investigation and had insufficient evidence to support the decision to...

9. LN v N Family Trust and others [2023] NZDT 503 (18 September 2023) [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...the occupiers are each liable for half of the cost of building one. 32. LN has served a fencing notice under the FA on the Trust and the Trust has served a cross notice. The parties are agreed that a fence should be built in this area to create privacy and to demarcate the boundary. They are unable to agree on where the fence should be built or on the style of the fence. 33. Section 11 FA provides that if it is impractical or undesirable to erect a fence on the boundary of adjoini...

10. OIA-104489.pdf [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...internal Ministry document which summarises the meeting with the Rules Committee from June 2022, where the legislative and policy changes for the Tribunal were discussed. Some information has been withheld under section 9(2)(a) of the Act, to protect privacy of natural persons, section 9(2)(f)(iv) of the Act, to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, and section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of pub...