VAB v Corrections [2022] NZHRRT 31 [pdf, 215 KB]
...protective adult, as well as the plaintiff’s “past sexualised behaviour” and his concerns about having a baby daughter as providing an objective basis for Ms Bakker’s belief that it was necessary to make the disclosure. [36] The plaintiff’s response to Corrections submissions, relies on the notes from 8 June 2010 where it was recorded that there was no “immediate risk”. The test is however whether there was an “imminent” risk. As discussed in Director of Human Rights...