Search Results

1. Taipana - Āorangi Part Taonui Āhuatūranga Block 3A2 (2024) 486 Aotea MB 169-185 (486 AOT 169-185) [pdf, 688 KB]

   ...obtained in writing. The Landowner(s), the Occupier and any other interested party will meet within 14 days of any notification and jointly discus how the issue is to be resolved. (d) The Occupier may invite visitors to the Site. The Occupier is responsible for any visitors they invite to the Site and they must ensure they abide by the terms and conditions of occupation. 7. Rates (a) If the Site is separately rated, the Occupier shall pay all rates levied in respect of the Site...

2. O Ltd v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 480 (21 September 2023) [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...made and sent. O LTD’s failure to provide such a schedule was a breach of the parties’ agreement, and had made it difficult for KH to keep his customers informed of the progress of their orders. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 7 OS’s response to this was that there was, generally, only yarn for 2 or 3 rugs on O LTD’s premises at any one time. It was understood by both parties that, when yarn arrived, any work of another client that was in progress would be completed, and th...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 278 Hanan and Banco Trustees v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...is intended to be general information only. While considerable effort has been made to ensure that the information provided on this map is accurate, current and otherwise adequate in all respects, Queenstown Lakes District Council does not accept any responsibility for content and shall not be responsible for, and excludes all liability, with relation to any claims whatsoever arising from the use of this map and data held within. Map Date: 5/10/2023 Annexure 3 Ch 24 and 27 provisions...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 093 Ocean Dynamics Limited v Tauranga City Council [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Plan dated 2 May 2023 ii. Elevations dated 8 June 2022 (f) Additional information received via email from Lysaght on 14 November, 5th, and 22nd December 2022 titled ‘RE: RC29841– s92 RFI - 105 Birch Avenue’ 2. The consent holder shall be responsible for aAll costs associated with the conditions of this consent, including preparation and registration of the covenant under condition 29 or costs related to service agreements or upgrades those required under the Infrastructure Deve...

5. Madoc v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of Cover) [2023] NZACC 144 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...physical injury itself needs to be identified. [55] In making this decision, ACC relied on a medical case review dated 25 January 2021 by Mr Johnson. Mr Johnson found that That Mr Madoc suffered an injury to his lumbar spine in 2007. And in response to the question as to whether any of the appellant’s diagnosed conditions recorded in the documentary evidence are a consequence of or consequential upon treatment, he said: I advised in my letter that Mr Madoc’s symptoms are mul...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 99 Speed v Board of Trustees of Wellington Girls College [pdf, 254 KB]

   ...thinks fit. Counsel to assist [14] Mr Wass was appointed as counsel to assist. The Court is grateful for his thorough and very helpful submissions and other assistance. [15] Mr McBride appeared for the College in the original hearing and in response to Mr Speed’s applications. His participation was described as being to assist the Court with factual and legal matters aside from which the College abided the Court’s decision. Preliminary issue [16] There is a prelimina...

7. Watson v Day - Torere Section 64 (2024) 310 Waiariki MB 227 (310 WAR 227) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...Rakau, and after undertaking their due diligence, rejected the option. This is noted in the Committee of Management minutes of March 2018. [47] Mr Watson says that the previous Committee of Management had commenced discussions with the Minister responsible for the Provincial Growth Fund, and that senior officials in the ministry were supporting an application to secure funding. He says that funding was not pursued by the current CoM, and the cumulative potential loss (alongside th...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 230 Pilgrim & Ors v The Attorney General & Ors [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...table. It is appropriate that costs be ordered against the Overseeing Shepherd (position, not individual). I reach that conclusion because the Overseeing Shepherd was held to be the employer and it is the Overseeing Shepherd who is ultimately responsible for all that goes on within the Gloriavale Community. The person in the position of Overseeing Shepherd is currently Howard Temple. Costs – Attorney-General [37] I now deal with the issue of costs against the Attorney-Ge...

9. [2025] NZREADT 16 – DQ & KU v CAC 2204 & Rule (20 May 2025) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...The three flat owners at no. 7 had agreed to pay one-third each towards the cost of an easement, as well as contribute towards the repair of the driveway. [15] On 14 November 2023, each of the licensees provided a separate almost identical response to the Authority. They noted that there were letterboxes on the left and right of the driveway. On checking the documents, including the title and LIM report, it was not apparent any other investigation was needed. There was no sugge...

10. Peita v Accident Compensation Corporation (Backdated Weekly Compensation) [2025] NZACC 31 (20 February 2025) [pdf, 183 KB]

    ...the diabetes been diagnosed earlier. [9] Dr Matsis, Cardiologist, provided advice on 6 March 2019 concluding that Mr Peita’s cardiomyopathy was wholly caused by his underlying medical conditions, not any failure of the health professionals responsible for his care and that there had been an unwillingness by Mr Peita to engage with his GP practice to address these conditions. [10] The Corporation also obtained further medical notes from Mr Peita’s previous General Practition...