Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 256 Sieling v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...consent memorandum. Directions dated 23 November 2022 afforded those parties a further opportunity to either sign the consent memorandum or raise any opposition to, or issue with, the agreement of the parties as set out in the joint memorandum. No response was received. [7] In the absence of any notice by any of them opposing the proposed consent order and any reason why the proposed consent order should not be made, and in the interests of the timely and cost-effective resolution o...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 65 Alkazaz v Cognizant New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...1112 at [14]–[20]. 8 Elisara v Allianz New Zealand Ltd [2020] NZEmpC 13, [2020] ERNZ 20 at [9]. that. I do, however, accept counsel for the company’s submission that a counteroffer made by the company to settle the proceedings (in response to Mr AlKazaz’s walk- away offer) ought to be taken into account in assessing costs. The offer was unreasonably declined and supports an uplift in costs. [12] The sum of $34,000.00 is currently being held by the Court as secur...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 142 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...further acknowledge and accept that Mr AlKazaz’s conduct of these proceedings has unduly resulted in more costs being incurred by Enterprise IT than would be usual. Mr AlKazaz’s conduct of his case required a greater level of communication and responsiveness from Enterprise IT than would ordinarily be the case. [16] With these factors in mind, I find that costs of $16,000 are payable by Mr AlKazaz to Enterprise IT. [17] No costs are ordered in respect of the application fo...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 007 Canterbury Regional Council v MacLee Holdings Ltd [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...firefighting chemicals and contaminated soil, must be removed in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate any likely adverse effects of contaminants leaching to groundwater and contaminating downstream bores used for potable supply. [5] Despite not being responsible for lighting the fire, the respondent, as the owner of the property has been on notice that the Regional Council has concerns 1 The legal description is Section 25 SO 482782 on identifier 725731. 4 regarding the burnt...

5. 2021-07-13 Minute - PC7 - Deemed Permits and Rights of Priority [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...resource consent by [date 1]”. If not done, the provisions will not be applied as intended for the reasons set out in the closing submissions of Mr Maw.2 Way forward – date We attach for the parties’ consideration, draft provisions in response to the matters raised by counsel and the planners (Annexure A). We agree that a date should be included. The purpose of including a date is to make clear when applicants with lower rights of priority are required to propose a co...

6. DG of Conservation MJ Brass Supplementary Evidence on pRPS 20 July 2021 [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...Supplementary Evidence 4. On 26 June 2021 the Otago Regional Council notified the Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 (pORPS). 5. Following that, the Court issued a Minute on 30 June 2021 seeking further evidence and legal submissions in response to the notification of the pORPS. The issues to be addressed were then set out in a Memorandum of Counsel for the Otago Regional Council in relation to Issues for the Court’s Determination in respect to the Proposed Otago Regi...

7. WD v HT [2023] NZDT 674 (1 November 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...enter and pool on the floor under the bed, however that is inconsistent with the long-term damage found by [caravan specialists], which said this would have taken years to develop. 9. HT states that whatever happened after the purchase was not his responsibility, but he later agreed to assist WD with the cost of repairs, however no agreement was reached regarding an amount. 10. HT argues that WD was aware of the moisture issues in the bathroom at the time of purchase so the portion...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 135 MGK Homes Ltd v Yoon [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...expanded on how stressed Ms Yoon was with the uncertainty of waiting for a hearing and her inability to access the remedies awarded to her in the Authority. In order to facilitate the hearing proceeding, he advised that Ms Yoon was prepared to take responsibility for the full cost of the interpreter in the first instance, subject to her being able to claim such cost back in the event she is successful. [9] Ms Kim, on behalf of Mr Mingon Kang, a director of the plaintiff, submitted...

9. KX v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 749 (8 December 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...fibreglass, bonded with epoxy resin. As is the usual practice the stick was covered with a specialist fabric tape designed to prevent wear. 4. In June KX noticed that the composite layers were beginning to delaminate, and contacted T Ltd . T Ltd’s response was that there was only a 30 day warranty for damaged hockey sticks and the damage was outside of that timeframe. Correspondence followed which failed to resolve the issue. As a result, KX has brought a claim against T Ltd...

10. MOJ0510_Work-out-parenting-arrangements_Mar23.pdf [pdf, 430 KB]

    ...can: • download the forms from the Ministry of Justice website: justice.govt.nz/apply-to-the-family-court • freephone the Ministry of Justice on 0800 224 733 to be sent a copy Applying to the Family Court A guardian is an adult who is responsible for the upbringing and care of a child. https://www.justice.govt.nz/family/family-violence/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/family/family-violence/ http://areyouok.org.nz https://www.justice.govt.nz/family/care-of-children/resolving-pare...