Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee v ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14 [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...discount costs given ability to pay or unfairness in quantum, and costs orders were made as noted. As recorded by the Tribunal at the hearing, if some time is required for payment we consider the Law Society and its various institutions will act as responsible creditors and give reasonable consideration to any payment proposition made if there is in fact some difficulty in making full repayment in the normal course. 10 Reasons for Suppression [38] The practitio...

2. Auckland 356 Complaints Committee and Auckland No. 1 Standards Committee v Sanders [2010] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...hopes to undertake some part-time legal work at some stage to obtain some income. We do not consider there is any risk to the public if Mr Sanders is employed in legal practice because he will not be operating without oversight and he will not have responsibility for a trust account. DATED at WELLINGTON this 10th day of August 2010 D J Mackenzie Chair

3. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 TGKL case law 3 effects [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...further submitted that if any effects did arise from the proposed marine farm, the extensive monitoring proposed in the conditions of. consent, together with the review provisions, enabled these effects to be remedied by an . adaptive management response. [13] Under the PWARMP all marine fanns are discretionary activities. We are therefore required to have regard to the matters set out in section 104(1) of the Act prior to exercising our discretion under section 105(1). We identify...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief John Cawley final [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...detract from my opinions. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 11. This Statement of Evidence covers the following: (a) A summary of my evidence (Executive Summary); (b) An overview of the key points from my Report (Previous Report); (c) Response to issues raised in the Applicant's evidence (Response to Applicant's Evidence); (d) Comments on draft conditions and proposed mitigation (Conditions / Mitigation); and Page 4 31547615:629148 (e) Conclusio...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 115 Te Whanau a Kai Trust v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 9.4 MB]

   ...for freshwater ( s 3.1 ). • Significant resource management issues including Issue 6 "Recognising Tangata Whenua Values", which focusses on the mauri of water and acknowledges the importance of recognising and providing for kaitiaki responsibilities (Section 3.2) • RPS objectives, which are both Regional Policy Statement and Regional Plan Objectives (Section 3.3). • Strategic policies and methods which focus on engagement and collaboration with all relevant stakeho...

6. [2023] NZEnvC 141 Nature Preservation Trustee Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 30 MB]

   ...departure of heavy vehicles. e) Reversing beepers to be limited in terms of sound level and frequency of use. f) Discouragement of vehicles idling on site for extended periods of time. This could be included as part of the site foreman’s responsibilities. g) No use of horns unnecessarily. h) Rock breaking should only occur between 0730 and 1800 hours Monday to Friday, and between 0730 hours and 1300 hours Saturday (excluding Public Holidays). i) If the concrete floatin...

7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 49/09 Norske Skog Tasman Ltd v Manufacturing and Construction Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 135 KB]

   NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LTD V MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION & ANOR AK AC 49/09 9 December 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 49/09 ARC 71/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION INC First Defendant AND BRIAN BOYLEN Second Defendant Hearing: 28 May 2009 (Heard at Auckland) with addit

8. [2013] NZEmpC 85 Aarts v Barnados New Zealand [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...Aarts to the Ombudsman and so outlined the background to his complaint including his dealings with Police and request for copies of the videotaped interviews. In the course of this lengthy letter, Mr Aarts referred to the detective principally responsible for the handling of the video interviews. Mr Aarts’s letter included the following passages: [Detective A] of the Rotorua Police has made a false statement in his report to Barnardos dated June 2006, where he claimed that: ...

9. Holmes v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...ongoing concerns about TAS this is how I interpreted your request. You have since indicated that this request did not relate to TAS. I understand that Crown Law have written to you asking for your interpretation of this request and have not received a response. I have checked your 2010 Annual General Adjustment and may have found the cause of the confusion surrounding this request. As you will know, your benefit is paid on Thursdays and it is paid in arrears. This means that on 1 Ap...

10. Cole v Realty Insight Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 259 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000010 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 25 BETWEEN MICHAEL and ADELE COLE Claimants AND EURO-ASIA INVESTMENTS CO LTD First Respondent (Settled) AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) Second Respondent (Settled) AND REALTY INSIGHT LIMITED Third Respondent AND DAVID LEE Fourth Respondent (Settled) AND THEOTESTO REYES Fifth Respondent AND CITYWIDE BUILDING CONSULTANTS (AUCKLAND)