Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 109 Hixon (Labour Inspector) & Collins v Campbell Ors interlocutory [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...for substituted service. This provides that service may be effected “in such other manner as the Registrar of the court or a Judge directs …”. [3] Unlike in the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority), service of proceedings is the responsibility of the parties and, except when sending out fixture notices, not the Court. [4] This is a proceeding removed by the Authority under s 178 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 for hearing at first instance. 2 It concerns an...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 218 Corporate Energy Ltd (in liq) (formerly known as Corporate Energy Ltd t/a Caltex Glenbrook) v Singh [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...Corporate Energy Limited. [4] As no steps were taken by the plaintiff to comply with the timetabling, Mr Laurent, on behalf of Mr Singh, filed an interlocutory application on notice to strike out or dismiss the proceedings. That elicited some response to a degree from Corporate Energy Limited in that a person who purported to be a director of the company wrote to the Court advising that Corporate Energy Limited intended to participate in the proceedings. [5] Prior to that time...

3. Ryan v CAC10067 & Skinner [2013] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 26 KB]

   ...the real estate industry, but also preserving the licensee’s good name. Mr Parker submits that to be a just and reasonable outcome “particularly, given the stress that he [the licensee] has experienced as part of this process”. [4] The response of Mr Hodge, on behalf of the Authority, has been to note that we have upheld the Committee’s decision to take no further action on the complaint made against the licensee so that the licensee has been found not guilty of disciplinary...

4. AGI Ltd v ZVN Ltd and ZVM [2013] NZDT 423 (25 October 2013) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...the expiry dates of the products in February or March 2013. However, this does not explain the non payment of the invoices till that time. [7] AGI Ltd says they tried to contact ZVN Ltd by phone and also by text and email. However, the only response they received back was a text sometime around June 2013 saying that they should collect the product. AGI Ltd claim they received no advice from ZVN Ltd that they had concerns about the product until the matter was brought to the Tribu...

5. Legal aid for protection orders [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...latest set of annual accounts, if you are self-employed or have an interest in a business • your trust form, if you have an interest in a trust. You may want to take an advocate or support person with you. The Legal Services Commissioner is responsible for decisions regarding the granting of legal aid. This pamphlet outlines how legal aid works in the case of protection orders.

6. CAC10063 v Picknell [2013] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...ensure that she can continue to operate safely as a real estate agent in the future and should continue to attend Continuing Education classes to upskill herself as an agent. The Tribunal also considered she was lacking in a clear understanding of the responsibility of her role as an agent. Tribunal’s Decision [23] Accordingly the Tribunal make the following orders: [a] An order suspending the licence of Ms Picknell for a period of nine months under s.110(2)(c); [b] An or...

7. Ministerial briefing: Investment Approach: 2015 wrap-up & sketch of 2016 work [pdf, 765 KB]

   ...victimisation 5. Level 2 is about answering the question: which groups of people and places will contribute most to the future burden of crime on society? 6. An RFP for actuarial support to build the necessary statistical models has been issued. Responses will be received on 11 December, and the provider will start work on the Integrated Data Infrastructure by 1 February 2016. Level 3: ROI analysis 7. Level 3 is about answering the question: which investments will most cost-effect...

8. BY v XW LCRO 162 / 2010 (15 April 2011) [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...having acted for her uncle and a Maori land matter. Mr XW had explained that as a Barrister he holds no wills or other documents, and directed her to his former law firm, AAZ (now ABA) to inquire further. Ms BY considered that Mr XW‟s immediate response to her enquiry was unprofessional. [8] Ms BY then attended AAZ and the administrator she engaged with did a brief computer check and informed her that the firm did not hold a will for her uncle. Ms BY was dissatisfied with the...

9. CE v XQ LCRO 182 / 2010 (27 May 2011) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...hearing”. [6] The Standards Committee was uncertain as to what the Applicant was referring to, and sought clarification from her. In this regard, the Complaints Service wrote to the Applicant on 8 April 2010 requesting this information. No response was received and a further request was sent to her on 5 May 2010. On 19 May 2010 the Applicant sought an extension of time as she was awaiting the return of her files. [7] By 12 July 2010, the Applicant had still not provided the i...

10. Retford v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 15, 23 & 38 / 2010 (7 July 2010) [pdf, 55 KB]

    ...lawyer and referring to himself as “counsel acting”, and that he instructed, or was instrumental in arranging, the service of documents on her in an intimidating manner. [14] The Practitioner was notified of these complaints and provided responses to the Standards Committee in respect of each. The Standards Committee determined that all of the matters arising in the complaints should be referred to the Disciplinary Tribunal. Review [15] In relation to each of the three rev...