Search Results

1. CAC20005 v Peng [2015] NZREADT 4 [pdf, 227 KB]

   ...Lot 522 would give her a higher commission; and that the Defendant had responded that she was not interested in obtaining more commission by cheating a purchaser. It seemed to be eventually accepted before us that Mr O’Brien simply smiled at that response. Other evidence for the prosecution [32] There was a helpful brief of evidence from the said lawyer, Mr M M Toepfer, and from Mr G M Gallacher, a senior investigator for the Authority. That evidence was accepted by consent without...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 026 Marlborough District Council v Burkhart Industries Ltd [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   ...Environment Court and District Court are the only bodies with statutory jurisdiction to make enforcement orders under the RMA. The RMA does not allow that jurisdiction to be delegated to a Councilor anyone else. Nor would such delegation of judicial responsibility be ordinarily appropriate. [66] In any case, I accept RFB's submission that these orders are inappropriate. That is not only in the sense that they are clumsily drafted such that they are readily capable of being mi...

3. WHT - glossary [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...reviewing the Building Code and producing documents to show to how to comply with it. The DBH also monitored the performance of the Building Consent Authorities and district and city councils, and could investigate complaints. These functions are now the responsibility of the Weathertight Services Group of MBIE Deposited plan: Survey plan giving legal definition to a property’s boundaries. Designated land: Generally applies to land owned by the Crown, local authorities or network...

4. Fehling v Appleby [2014] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0082/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM53465� http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0082/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM53465� 13 findings of the Tribunal (incorrectly referred to as the Human Rights Commission). None of this is Mr Appleby’s responsibility but his failure (and that of the Board) to correct the misattribution to Mr Appleby of the statement that “money has been taken from our kids” and the failure to draw attention by way o...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 173 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Maritime Union of NZ Inc [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...proposed strike. [3] LPC asserts that the Union’s notice to strike relates to an essential service, and is defective on several significant grounds; the Union responds by stating that proper notice has been given, and that the strike is a legal response to difficulties the parties have encountered in bargaining for a new collective agreement. Background [4] Members of MUNZ have been bound by a collective employment agreement (CEA) with LPC for many years; the most recen...

6. Justice Sector Outlook December 2016 [pdf, 758 KB]

   ...curfew, and requires the offender to remain at an approved residence at certain times specified by the court. Community Detention length ranges between 14 days and six months. Community Work: Punitive sentence that gives offenders an opportunity to take responsibility for their offending and learn new skills and work habits. Offenders do unpaid work in the community to pay something back for the offence they have committed. Community Work hours range between 40 and 400 hours (at up to 40...

7. Boon v Tuwhangai - Kawhia U2B Block [2020] Chief Judges MB 1084 (2020 CJ 1084) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...copy of the minute was sent to the Māori Trustee on 27 March 1992. A copy of the letter is on file with a handwritten note stating that the order was sent to the Māori Trustee on 23 April 1992. 14. On 18 June 1992 a letter was sent to MM Moke in response to her query regarding the involvement of the Māori Trustee in receiving the purchase money for Kawhia U2B. A copy of an email is on file from the Māori Trustee confirming that they received and forwarded payment of $10,500 for...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 101 Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...practice which the company adopted when a person left their employment. These actions are not consistent with an ongoing employment relationship, and I do not accept Mr Nadan’s evidence to the contrary. [33] Mr Nadan provided a lengthy formal response to the letter raising a personal grievance on 25 September, and after taking advice. Again, there is no suggestion in the letter that Mr Nath was mistaken in his view that his employment had been terminated. Indeed, Mr Nadan...

9. Justice Sector Outlook December 2016 [pdf, 882 KB]

   ...curfew, and requires the offender to remain at an approved residence at certain times specified by the court. Community Detention length ranges between 14 days and six months. Community Work: Punitive sentence that gives offenders an opportunity to take responsibility for their offending and learn new skills and work habits. Offenders do unpaid work in the community to pay something back for the offence they have committed. Community Work hours range between 40 and 400 hours (at up to 40...

10. Legal aid provider manual - cancellation of approvals - part 4 [pdf, 578 KB]

    ...Restrictions 3-12 Assessment and Recommendation 3-13 Decision and Notification Part 5: Cancellation of Approvals Provider Services Manual Chapter 3: Cancellation Process 3-3 Version 1.0 June 2011 Stages of the Cancellation Process Responsibilities All cancellation matters are referred to the Secretary for Justice for a decision. The Secretary must establish a Performance Review Committee and may refer cancellation matters to the Committee under particular circumstances...