Search Results

1. FQQ Ltd v TJ [2017] NZDT 1044 (11 April 2017) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...a Nissan Laurel for which the parts appeared to be suitable. (d) When approached by Mr TJ about the purchases, Mr YN admitted they were his and said he would pay for them, but to date no payment has been made. Mr YN was prepared to accept responsibility for only some of the invoices. At the hearing he also said that he had told Mr TJ from the beginning that he was purchasing things for himself on the TJJ account at FQF, but Mr TJ was clear that this had not occurred, because a...

2. ENV-2016-CHC-000071 Affirmation of Ms Jennifer Miller [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...(Waitaki District and Mackenzie District Councils) as to whether the applicants for ECan water permits had also sought resource consent or certificates of compliance for the land use aspects of their proposed activities. 15. From the Councils' responses, we determined that Simons Hill Station Limited and Simons Pass Station Limited (Simons Hill and Simons Pass) had been granted certificates of compliance by Mackenzie District Council to place up to 24 centre pivot irrigation st...

3. RX v GR LCRO 27/2014 (15 February 2017) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...KL, who was bankrupted, and to Miss RX. Miss RX wants Mr GR to indemnify her for the losses she sustained in acting for Mr KL. [8] Miss RX’s application for review proceeds on the basis that the Committee erred, and/or failed in its statutory responsibility, by dismissing her complaints. Miss RX says Mr GR’s advice caused damage and loss to Mr KL, and to her. She says Mr GR’s representation of Mr KL and the Union at the same time gave rise to a conflict of interest between...

4. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Application - Appendix B4 [pdf, 48 KB]

   ...http://www.questionpro.com/a/viewDynamicSlideShow.do?... 13 of 15 24/02/12 4:47 PM Please rank your preference for an ownership and business structure, with 1 being highest and 3 being lowest (you do not necessarily need to give more than one response). All models assume that a ‘community dividend’ will be part of the rules. This information will help us in the next stage of our work. Average Rank 1 2 3 4 Community Co-operati ... 1.53 A Joint Venture invo ... 1.72 A conventional...

5. LCRO 104/2020 LN v RT (30 September 2020) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...necessary to her client’s application and she made reasonable enquiries. She was satisfied of all she was obliged to be satisfied of. Ms RT set out the steps she had taken to reach that point. [6] The Committee considered Ms RT’s detailed response and concluded further action was not necessary or appropriate with respect to either element of Mr LN’s complaint. Application for review [7] Mr LN applied for a review. He would like this Office to reverse the Committee’s d...

6. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bill [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...objective of protecting and promoting the stability of New Zealand’s financial system, which is relevant to its role as prudential regulator and supervisor of financial institutions. The Bill aims to increase coordination between public agencies responsible for the financial system and to create a new framework to better manage the use of New Zealand’s foreign exchange reserves. 7. The new provisions within the Bill: a. create a new governance board for the Bank; b. requir...

7. [2020] NZEnvC 148 Donaldson v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...interest. However, that does not itself dictate that the Society ought to be given waiver to join the proceedings. Insofar as these are live issues in the appeals, Queenstown Lakes District Council, as the respondent planning authority, already has responsibility for them. That is at least to the extent that water quality impacts of land development are matters that fall within s31 (1 )(a), RMA. That is insofar as they pertain to the integrated management of the effects of the use,...

8. [2019] NZEmpC 189 McCook v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...whether it should exercise its discretion to grant the application. [22] The strongest pointer in favour of joinder of Madison as a defendant, is that the claim brought by the plaintiffs against IR is one to which Madison should have the right of response. It will be directly affected by the plaintiffs’ claim;8 there may be an impact on its rights.9 [23] The plaintiffs’ case is at present binary. Mr Cranney advised the Court that at this stage, the plaintiffs do not contend...

9. Judicial appointments information booklet [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...Appointments to the Māori Land Court are made by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Minister of Māori Affairs. The Attorney-General places great importance on maintaining the quality and integrity of the judiciary. Putting the responsibility for all these appointments in the hands of the Attorney-General is intended to help to ensure a consistent and principled approach to these important decisions. In the case of appointments to the Supreme Court, the Cour...

10. LCRO 175/2018 QA v SZ (1 May 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...completeness, and so NZLS is aware, if it was not already, that slip had occurred. There is nothing in the materials that suggests the Committee lacked competence or was not impartial in its decision-making. Practitioner’s Reply [13] Mr SZ’s response is dated 4 October 2018. He relies on the information that was before the Committee. He adds that the trustees’ decision to purchase was a decision Mrs QA and her father made as trustees without seeking his advice on the deci...