Search Results

1. Barriball v Schimanski - Otaraoa-B2E Block (2021) 431 Aotea MB 256 (431 AOT 256) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...and that any future loans of this type be supported by an official document signed by both parties and adequate approval minuted by the trustees during their trustee meetings. 431 Aotea MB 261 (f) Fraud and theft detection policy and fraud responsibilities – a policy has not yet been adopted for fraud and theft detection. It was recommended that an appropriate policy be put in place as soon as possible. It was also noted that the trust must be aware of fraud issues and en...

2. Family Violence Summit 2017 summary report [pdf, 922 KB]

   ...HELPING CHILDREN AND THEIR WHĀNAU TO LIVE WITHOUT FAMILY VIOLENCE There was a wide range of responses to the theme of helping children and their whānau to live without family violence. These included ideas about prevention, comments on the responsiveness of whānau, the community and the family court system, and comments on wider contextual issues, such as mental health, poverty and addiction. Themes emerging from the online submissions and discussion at workshops were: • the...

3. LCRO 119/2018 QL v DW (22 October 2019) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...QL said it was therefore “a total surprise” to him to be informed by Mr DW on 10 August 2017, the day before settlement of the purchase of his replacement house, that he would receive $115,000 whereas he required $122,000 for the purchase. Response [15] I refer to Mr DW’s response in my later analysis.5 Standards Committee decision [16] The Standards Committee delivered its decision on 25 May 2018 and determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006...

4. Tatere v Hauraki - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C No 1 (2021) 93 Tākitimu MB 135 (93 TKT 135) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...Respondent A20170004132 WĀHANGA Under Sections 241 and 242, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Part Tamaki 2A1C (Lot DP7840) and Other Blocks WAENGA Between CLINTON HEMANA AS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTEE OF RUA ROA TRUST Te Kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: On the papers Whakataunga: Judgment date 24 December 2021 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ M J DOOGAN Judgment of Judge M J Doogan (Fu...

5. LCRO 215/2020 YY v RN (27 September 2021) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...Ms YY that the complaints against Mr FN were being assessed, to ascertain whether the Complaints Service had all the necessary information to enable it to process the complaint. [16] Mr FN responded to the complaint on 19 June 2020. In that response he: (a) queried what jurisdiction the Complaints Service could exercise over him, bearing in mind that he had not been in practice for some time, and no longer held a practising certificate; and (b) advised that he did not intend to...

6. LCRO 6/2025 EI v NT (30 April 2025) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...advice that NT gave XE, as noted in the letter NT had sent to EI, contradicted the advice given to EI. [21] By way of outcome, EI sought “as a bare minimum”, a refund of the fees that she had paid NT for the advice she received in May 2023. Response by NT [22] NT responded to the complaint, in a letter to the Complaints Service dated 6 June 2024. In summary she said: (a) She provided assurance that none of the information that EI had given her in May 2023 had been disclosed to...

7. 2024 NZPSPLA 111.pdf [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...pillars are the people, and the roof is management and protection. [42] Profit Mr Taimalie says is not the focus but providing a good service, loyalty, and commitment. He said SPS Security only continued providing security services as he felt a responsibility for their contractors, and he had a sense of loyalty and commitment to them. He also said the reason why he continued operating after being directed not to, was because he was desperate not to leave their loyal customers withou...

8. Tranche 3 of Cabinet and Ministerial advice on changes to clubs and ranges regulations [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...changes made to the Cabinet paper following agency and Ministerial consultation. Overview of feedback, and changes made 3. We received feedback from ten agencies. Most had no comment, or minor comments. A table detailing this feedback, and our responses, is attached as Appendix One. 4. 5. Changes to the LEG paper 6. We have made minor changes to the LEG paper to take into account agency and Ministerial feedback. In addition to minor editorial changes for clarity, t...

9. Chief Victims Advisor report Thats a lie PDF [pdf, 693 KB]

   ...Because I thought it was my fault. Q. Well why didn't you discuss it with your mum so you could see, if you thought it was your fault? A. Because I thought I would get in trouble. Actually, can we take a break? Again, the complainant’s responses speak to a known reason for non-disclosure – a sense of responsibility and self-blame. In one trial, an adolescent complainant was questioned in such a way that suggests that given the nature of the offence (being raped at age...

10. McElroy & Ors as Trustees of the Shona and Roger McElroy Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...April 2004). Therefore, neither TPGL nor SI No 5 is a party to this adjudication. 3.5 The third respondent is Mr Stephen Lay, whom the Owners say was the builder who organised and supervised the construction work. Mr Lay’s actual role and responsibilities in the Ponsonby Gardens development will need to be determined by me, but there is no argument about the fact that Mr Lay was involved with the construction work on this project. The Owners claim that Mr Lay failed to man...