ND & UT v HX [2023] NZDT 329 (2 August 2023) [pdf, 130 KB]
...$1257.20 for the cost of the vet tending to his injured sheep. The issues to be decided are: a) Was HX legally justified in shooting A? b) Was there evidence that A had injured HX’s sheep and if so, should UT as the registered owner of A be responsible for paying the vet bills? c) Is HX responsible for paying $3,000.00 to UT for the loss of A? Section 60(1) of the Dog Control Act 1996 provides that where an owner of stock finds a dog running at large among their stock they ma...