CAC 403 v Tucker [2016] NZREADT 65 [pdf, 300 KB]
...before the Tribunal. Mr Tucker’s application was denied.1 [6] The Tribunal’s decision regarding the charges rests on its findings of fact in respect of the alleged conduct. In defending the charges, Mr Tucker contended either that he was not responsible for particular alleged conduct or, where he acknowledges responsibility, that conduct does not amount to disgraceful conduct. The charge of disgraceful conduct [7] Section 73(a) of the Act provides: 73 Misconduct For the p...