Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 94 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Elements Therapeutic Massage Limited and other(s) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...was necessary to wait for the second determination for it to be able to make a considered decision about whether to file a challenge to the first determination. It also said that the question of law is one of public interest. [10] In response, Mr Du said that the alleged error of law arose for the purposes of filing a challenge when the first determination was issued on 26 August 2022 and that there is no justification for the delay. He said that the first determination wa...

2. LCRO 196/2022 LQ and BQ v HN (2 December 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...[66] B Trustees Limited was appointed as trustees in substitution for A Trustees Ltd and it could be expected that at that time, a statement of assets and liabilities of the Trust would have been obtained by the new Trustee. Whether or not Mr HN was responsible for this, is unknown. He was not a director of B Trustees Limited. [67] In addition, each of the two gifts made needed to be documented and signed by [K], and having made two gifts, it is not unreasonable to expect that she could...

3. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Kwon [2024] NZLCDT 44 (11 December 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...following documentation in relation to your client [Ms D]: • All invoices; • Terms of engagement; • Any receipts; • Relevant trust account records; and • Relevant client account information with records of payments. 6 [14] In response to the first s 147 Notice Mr Kwon advised the Standards Committee that none of the required documents were in his possession or under his control or were not reasonably necessary for the purposes of the investigation. [15] In...

4. 10.4 Appendix D: Environment Court In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines 2011

   ...the hearing (or if an environment commissioner is authorised by the Chief Environment Court Judge to preside under section 280 of the Resource Management Act, then to the Chief Environment Court Judge) counsel for the parties any unrepresented party. Response to application Within three working days of receipt of an application, any party receiving it must notify the hearing manager, the media applicant and the other parties in writing: that the application is not opposed or that the applicati...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media centre >
   4. Media information >
   5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
   6. 10.0 Appendices

5. National Standards Committee 1 v Yang [2025] NZLCDT 30 (18 June 2025) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...the earliest point would have slowed the Police enquiry, he acted as he did from understandable fear (of both Police suspicion and kidnappers) and in understandable doubt about his ethical responsibilities. No harm was ultimately done to Police response, because he provided all the information four days later. At the time of this hearing, all the offenders have pleaded guilty and are in custody awaiting sentence. The four-day lapse [15] The Standards Committee submits that a del...

6. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Ellis [2018] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 558 KB]

   ...of engagement.4 (c) That his fee invoice of 9 March 2016 was substantially unjustified and contained elements of duplication of the earlier fees invoice of 22 June 2011. (d) That he delegated much of his trust accounting and administrative responsibilities to staff members and that sometimes he gets let down.5 (e) That he was not well acquainted with the Regulations. [29] The respondent is the trust account supervisor with responsibilities under reg 16(4) of the Regulations. He...

7. Southland Standards Committee v W [2013] NZLCDT 28 [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...alternative arrangements; (c) Persistent lack of adequate knowledge of the law and procedure in criminal matters in which the respondent was representing clients, to the detriment of the respondent’s clients; and, (d) Persistent lack of response to the legitimate requirements of the respondent’s clients, and to their family members, to an unacceptable degree. [5] In support of its case the Standards Committee filed affidavits from various practitioners who had obser...

8. Speaking about cultural background at sentencing: section 16 of the Criminal Justice Act 1985 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...eight 73 4.4 Case study nine 84 4.5 Discussion 90 5 Use of section 16 by other ethnic groups: case studies ten and eleven 95 5.1 Methodology 95 5.2 Case study ten 97 5.3 Case study eleven 101 5.4 Discussion 112 6 Survey 115 6.1 Introduction 115 6.2 Response rates 115 6.3 Sample profile 116 6.4 Respondents’ involvement in cases of section 16 use 118 6.5 Cases in which section 16 was used 119 6.6 Perceptions of section 16 125 6.7 Further comments 131 7 Overview 137 7.1 The extent to which se...

9. [2006] NZEmpC WC 15/06 OCS Ltd v Food Workers Union Inc [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...OCS’s contract manager at Wellington Hospital, said that she had raised the Panztel implementation with staff in at least one staff meeting and had some discussions with individual staff when they asked her about the Panztel. She said she had no response from the union or its members and felt that no news was good news. The first Ms Sanele, who is a cleaner and a union delegate, heard of the Panztel was when Ms Kyle mentioned it to her in August 2005. Ms Sanele asked her...

10. LCRO 110/2017 EB v APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF A PROSECUTORIAL DECISION [pdf, 262 KB]

    ...of the full amount of the dividends he had received on her behalf; (k) without her knowledge, Mr EB has been holding $2,528.42 of her money for over five years; and 5 (l) he has not accounted to her for interest earned on the money. Response [28] Mr EB responded to the complaint in a letter to the Complaints Service dated 20 December 2016. He submitted that: (a) Ms AD had never uplifted her file despite saying she would do so on 5 July 2011; (b) after receiving advic...