Search Results

1. ENVC Matiatia party corresp joint memo WML AT 20150703 [pdf, 719 KB]

   ...compliance with the conditions of this consent. This section shall provide details on the following: (a) Name, qualifications, relevant experience and contact details of an appropriately qualified and experienced project Team Leader, who shall be responsible for overseeing compliance with the CMP. (b) Names, qualifications, relevant experience, and methods for contact of principal staff employed, along with details of their roles and responsibilities. (c) Methods and systems to inform...

2. ENVC Matiatia party corresp RPMay15 coastal permit draft conditions [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...compliance with the conditions of this consent. This section shall provide details on the following: (a) Name, qualifications, relevant experience and contact details of an appropriately qualified and experienced project Team Leader, who shall be responsible for overseeing compliance with the CMP. (b) Names, qualifications, relevant experience, and methods for contact of principal staff employed, along with details of their roles and responsibilities. (c) Methods and systems to inform...

3. Roos v Wang [2010] NZWHT Auckland 10 [pdf, 288 KB]

   ................................................................... 24 (a) Principal Claim of Negligence ............................................................ 29 (b) Negligent Misstatement ...................................................................... 36 No assumption of responsibility ................................................................. 38 No Reliance ............................................................................................... 42 Removal A...

4. McQuade v Young & Ors as Trustees for the Maureen Young Family Trust [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...6.7 Liability of sixth respondent (Boyd Aluminium Ltd) 6.7.1 The claimants do not make a claim against the sixth respondent. The submissions by the first named first respondent makes reference at paragraphs 4.2, 4.3 and 8.1 to Boyd Aluminium responsibilities and implies that they were possibly responsible for not installing flashings. The fourth respondent claim that should they be found liable then the sixth respondent should contribute to that liability and at paragraph 53 of th...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 77 Jones v Downer NZ Ltd [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...as all being “as bad as each other” and the meeting was just a chance to have “a go” at him. He went on to say that he would not stop until he had “taken down” Mr Green and Mr Gray. In particular he claimed that Mr Green had been responsible for blacklisting Jones Electrical, a business operated by Mr Jones’ son. Attempts to invite Mr Jones to deal with Mr Dawson, if he had problems, did not gain much traction. Eventually, Mr Jones requested an opportunity to speak to...

6. Elizabeth (Lizzy) Marie Marvin (CSU-2024-CCH-000298) [pdf, 364 KB]

   ...help was coming and to get down low. Within two minutes Lizzy was breathing very heavily, and after two and a half minutes Lizzy was essentially unresponsive. The call-taker stayed on the line for 10 minutes, trying to comfort Lizzy and elicit a response. 6 Page 6 of 27 [35] Off-duty NZDF firefighter Samuel Abernethy saw the blaze. Mr Abernethy lived only metres away in a unit in the same complex of buildings. [36] He was awoken at 2.11am by Ms Marvin’s screams, and...

7. CL & ZA v GU LCRO 148/2013 (25 May 2016) [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...having followed the process set out in rule 10.2 and its sub-rules. The lawyers’ response to Mrs GU’s complaint is primarily from Mr CL. I accept, as Mr CL says, that Mr ZA was acting according to his directions. Unfortunately, Mr CL’s responses in the complaints process are suggestive of a more unsettling problem. [54] Mr CL and Mr ZA were each under a fundamental obligation, when providing regulated services to Mr GU, to be independent in providing those services. Le...

8. V Nair v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 31 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...of $500 and $800. [15.7.5] In summary, the total fees charged were $3,700 of which $50 was unpaid. However, that is not reconciled with the payments identified. [15.7.6] In addition, the new adviser was paid $1,550. [15.8] The adviser was not responsible for delay in filing the application and the new adviser’s further delay is evidence of that. [15.9] Someone informed the adviser’s clients her licence had been cancelled and that a new adviser would be taking over. [15.10] Wh...

9. Ratima v Smith - Te Haroto 2B2B (2018) 70 Takitimu MB 88 (70 TKT 88) [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...requirements of the Trustee Act 1956 and the provisions of the Act. In other words, trustees are subject to traditional trustee duties with the statutory overlay of particular obligations arising from the context of ahu whenua trusts. [30] The general responsibilities of responsible trustees are set out in s 223 of the Act. General trust law principles are also relevant, as are any additional responsibilities set out in the trust order. The obligations of a trustee are well estab...

10. LCRO 207/2015 CA v BE (21 August 2018) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...complaint, a Legal Standards Officer (LSO) telephones the lawyer concerned, outlines the complaint and informs the lawyer of the Committee’s preliminary view. As a consequence of that process being adopted, Mr BE was not required to provide a formal response to the complaint made. [11] The Committee distilled the issues raised by Mrs CA as requiring inquiry as to whether Mr BE had breached any duties owed to Mrs CA. The complaints, framed in the language of professional conduc...