Search Results

1. MD Ltd v UB [2017] NZDT 1483 (12 February 2018) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...goods, and incurred a monthly administration fee, the contract qualifies as a consumer credit contract under CCCFA s 11. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Has MD made the disclosure required under CCCFA s 17? b) Did MD comply with the lender responsibility principles? c) What sum, if any, is payable? Has MD made the disclosure required under CCCFA s 17? 4. CCCFA s 17 requires a creditor to ensure that the applicable key information set out in CCCFA Schedule 1 is disclosed to...

2. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...of US who is currently overseas. OT said that US was unable to take his car to N Ltd and asked OT to do it for him. 5. OT said that he was aware that there were two signs at N Ltd’s business stating the following: “PARK AT YOUR OWN RISK Not Responsible for theft or damage to vehicles”. 6. OT said that although he was aware of the signage US who owns the car was not. 7. OT submitted that signage can not protect the business from responsibility. He said the Consumer Guarante...

3. UV v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 618 (28 November 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...hearing, but it did provide a written submission, which I considered. Pursuant to section 42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988, the Tribunal is entitled to rely on the available evidence. 4. The issues to be determined are: a. Is the company responsible for the baggage delay/damage and did UW report the loss/damage within the prescribed timeframes set out in the Montreal Convention? b. If so, is UW entitled to the sum claimed? Is the company responsible for the baggage delay/...

4. GO v HO [2022] NZDT 213 (2 December 2022) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...must lie with HO, as it was his decision to park his bike in front of a car, to one side, and most likely over the front line, away from the direction of travel that GO was focussed on, that has been the fundamental cause. 21. Weighing up the responsibilities, I have placed the responsibility of HO at 60% and GO at 40%, resulting in a payment due by HO to B Ltd of $1,175.72 Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 2 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Inform...

5. X School v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 338 (13 July 2023) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...would have been funding available. The response was that “if the funds had been requested at that time – they would have met the criteria for the covid funding that was available then.” 20. I find that H as the project manager with financial responsibility for the project was responsible for notifying X where there was a risk that the costs of the project would exceed the available funds. In failing to notify X when they ought to have known this, by January of 2021, they caused...

6. OIA-101256.pdf [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...like to receive the data in calendar years for this part of your request. On 17 January 2023, the Ministry decided to grant your request under section 15(1) of the Act. For administrative purposes, the Ministry has combined your requests into one response. The response to question 10 is being prepared and it will be released to you as soon as possible. Please accept my apology for the delay in responding to these questions. I will respond to each part of your requests in turn. 1. D...

7. OIA-109856.pdf [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...contact details for the contract thank you for your time and help On 20 February 2024, MSD partially transferred your request for information about Justice Services in the Ruapehu & Taumarunui areas to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) for response under section 14 of the Act. In response to your request, please find attached below, Appendix 1. This is released in full to you. Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the M...

8. Statement - Cyber security incident

   Update 18 January 2023 Please attribute to Ministry of Justice Acting Chief Operating Officer, Jacquelyn Shannon; The Ministry of Justice is aware of a development with the recent cyber security incident. The people responsible for the wider incident have released information, not related to coronial, on the dark web. The Ministry of Justice can confirm that no coronial files or information, including post mortem reports and coronial transport information, have been released or published. The Hi...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media releases

9. Criminal justice and victims

   ...system’s treatment of crimes and offenders needs to be mindful of the needs of victims, and this area includes the legislation that ensures appropriate provision is made for victims of crime. It also includes legislation providing for the justice system response to family violence and sexual violence. The systems in this area are: Investigations This system encompasses the tools available to the State to investigate and prosecute crimes. It provides the framework for the State to exercise its...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Regulatory stewardship >
   3. Regulatory systems and areas

10. Auckland Standards Committee v Morahan [2015] NZLCDT 35 [pdf, 31 KB]

    ...complaint before the Standards Committee on three occasions since 1 August 2008, namely in 2011, 2014 and 2015. [11] We find that it is not necessary to discuss the details of the individual complaints. What are relevant are the respondent’s responses to the complaints of 2011, 2014, and 2015 and to these charges including his submissions on penalty which we will discuss later in this decision. [12] The respondent made a plea to the Tribunal that it should not suspend him fro...