Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 152 Airbnb Australia Pty Limited v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   AIRBNB AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v CCC – PC4 – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 152 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act regarding Proposed Plan Change 4 to the Christchurch District Plan BETWEEN AIRBNB AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-19) Appellant AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environme...

2. Malik v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 7 [pdf, 313 KB]

   ............................................................................................. 30 Summary of Quantum .................................................................................... 31 WAS THE COUNCIL NEGLIGENT? ................................................................. 31 Inspections by Building Consent Authorities ..................................................... 32 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENCES OF THE COUNCIL – VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA / BREAK IN THE CHAIN OF CAU...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 112 Minister of Conservation v Wellington Regional Council [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...AGENCY (ENV-2019-WLG-000131) BEEF AND LAMB NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2019-WLG-000133) Appellants WELLINGTON REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act 29 June 2022 29 June 2022 CORRECTION TO CONSENT ORDER A: Under s 279(1)(6) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the Environment Court, by consent, orders that the changes set out in Appendix A be made to the Proposed Plan. Appendix A to this decision replaces Appendix A attach...

4. Reekie v Roberts [2013] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...already been delivered to Mr Roberts. Mr Roberts has a clear recollection of handing over to Mr Harrison all of Mr Reekie’s files. The only documents retained by Mr Roberts were six categories of handwritten instructions (they are itemised in the statement of reply) from Mr Reekie to Mr Roberts prepared for the purpose of the High Court trial along with a letter dated 23 May 2003 from Mr Roberts to Mr Reekie, and a copy of a letter from Mr Roberts to the (then) Auckland District Law S...

5. [2020] NZREADT 37 - Eade v Real Estate Agents Authority (25 August 2020) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...the complaint. Pursuant to s 78(b) of the Act, it decided to inquire into the conduct of the Agency. [6] In their responses to the complaint, submitted by their solicitors, Mr Quinton and the Agency agreed that the marketing brochure contained statements that Hereford would have a concierge and a live-in manager, but also referred to disclaimers in the advertising material and the appellants’ agreement for sale and purchase, and stated that decisions on these matters (and others)...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   W h a i a t e M a n a M o t u h a k e i n P u r s u i t o f M a n a M o t u h a k e Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W a i 2 4

7. [2016] NZEmpC 89 NZ Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...party who was dissatisfied with a determination of the Authority to elect to have the matter heard by the Court. The NZNO was required to specify the determination or the part of the determination to which its election related. It did so in its statement of claim by specifying the part of the Authority’s determination which found in WDHB’s favour on the question of the interpretation of the MECA dealing with retirement gratuities. The NZNO did not identify its challenge as in...

8. McGeorge v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 48 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...and compensation: [91.1] He is expected to explain to the Tribunal the circumstances identified in the liquidator’s reports. [91.2] He should consider making arrangements for a chartered accountant to prepare a source and application of funds statement in relation to his practice, and producing that to the Tribunal. [91.3] He will be expected to fully explain his personal financial circumstances, including providing a statement of assets and liabilities. [92] If Mr Standing does...

9. Hewitt v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 50 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...services required, and satisfied himself the figure of $7,900 including disbursements and excluding GST was fair and reasonable (taking account of it not being refundable, as he now claims). [66.5] Disclosed and obtained Ms and Mr Hewitt’s informed consent to an agreement to charge a fee that was non-refundable on certain contingencies. [67] The Tribunal’s Minute gave Mr Standing notice that unless he produced such records, or explained their absence, and demonstrated he did act pro...

10. AQ v ZI LCRO 105 / 2010 (11 February 2011) [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...the costs to conclude the matter. The Application for Review 4 [22] The Applicant has applied for a review of the Standards Committee’s decision. [23] He considers that the Standards Committee appears to have accepted nearly all of the statements from the Respondent on face value without question. [24] He also expresses concern as to the Committee’s acceptance of the Respondent’s explanation for not replying to his request for an estimate and refers to the “computer...