Search Results

1. AQ v UD LCRO 188/2013 (10 August 2013) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...incompetent because he failed to ask witnesses critical questions. In particular she is critical that Mr UD did not question the CYF social worker and two of the Court appointed supervisors about what Mrs AQ considered to be contradictory and untruthful statements made by those persons. [47] It is an exercise fraught with obvious difficulties, for a LCRO, in the course of conducting a review, to endeavour to analyse the ebb and flow of a High Court trial with a view to forming...

2. Apostolakis v Gilbert (Decision) [2018] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...biased. This factual inquiry should be rigorous, in the sense that complainants cannot lightly throw the “bias” ball in the air. [32] In Bradbury v Judicial Conduct Commissioner [2014] NZCA 441, [2015] NZAR 1 at [66] the Court emphasised the statement by Blanchard J in Saxmere at [20] that the party alleging apparent bias must also articulate a logical connection between the alleged disqualifying factor and the “feared deviation” from the course of deciding the case on its merits...

3. 1 Cab paper Repeal of three strikes law Redacted [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...arrangements, there will be additional stress for some victims associated with Parole Board consideration or re-sentencing. This risk would be mitigated by the fact that the Parole Board or judge will be able to refer back to any previous victim impact statements, so victims will not need to submit again if they choose not to. Victims may choose to participate during any parole hearings or re-sentencings in accordance with their statutory rights. s9(2)(h) s9(2)(h) RE LE AS ED B Y

4. Peake v Accident Compensation Corporation [2024] NZACC 134 (6 August 2024) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...the basis the surgeon who conducts the re-measuring does so in her presence. The Court agreed. [5] Mr Alex Lee, Orthopaedic Surgeon, conducted an examination of Ms Peake’s leg discrepancy, and provided a report dated 16 July 2024. Agreed statement of facts [6] The parties filed a statement of agreed facts as follows: (i) On 9 November 2015, Mr John Rietveld, orthopaedic surgeon, carried out a right total hip joint replacement. (ii) Ms Peake has cover for right trochanteri...

5. Foketi v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 86 [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...that he required more medical information, namely the hospital and GP notes, before he could comment on whether Mr Foketi had been incapacitated for the entire period since the accident. [23] ACC requested that Mr Foketi complete an ACC6300 consent form, so that ACC could obtain the medical information. Mr Foketi signed the form on 31 August 2022. [24] On 7 September 2022, a review was lodged for Mr Foketi under s 134(1)(b) on the basis that there had been an unreasonable dela...

6. Pue v Kīngi - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Whenua Tōpu Trust (2015) 335 Aotea MB 1 (335 AOT 1) [pdf, 389 KB]

   335 Aotea MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20110010577 A20140007669 UNDER Sections 238, 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Whenua Tōpu Trust BETWEEN RATA PUE (DECEASED) Applicant AND MARIA KĪNGI, PAUL CARR, CYNTHIA KĪNGI BROWN, RON PUATA, RANGI TAPATU and TAMZYN PUE Respondents Hearing: 310 Aotea MB 191 dated 10

7. LCRO 48/2019 VW v EX and TY (3 May 2021) [pdf, 324 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2021] NZLCRO 059 Ref: LCRO 048/2019 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN VW Applicant AND EX and TY Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [

8. 04-Appendix-Four-DCR_Part1.pdf [pdf, 23 MB]

   ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Design Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Consenting / Concept Design .................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Cultural Values and Design Framework Principles...

9. [2012] NZEmpC 146 Duffy v Ngatahi horticultural P/Ship [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...grievance with his or her employer within the period of 90 days beginning with the date on which the action alleged to amount to a personal grievance occurred or came to the notice of the employee, whichever is the later, unless the employer consents to the personal grievance being raised after the expiration of that period. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a grievance is raised with an employer as soon as the employee has made, or has taken reasonable steps to make, th...

10. Warrington - Hopa Te Piki (2011) 2011 Chief Judge's MB 325 (2011 CJ 325) [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...restrictions on Horowhenua no. 3 sub 2C. Village section is European title. The Court: Only lands that would pass by will are Horowhenua no. 3 subdivision 2C and leasehold interest in Levin Village Settlement. Mr MacMillian: That being so I consent to probate being granted. Probate granted accordingly to Patu Ranginui of Weraroa the sole executor named in will. Security Bond by executor and another for 50 pounds. Value of estate 100 pounds.” (Emphasis added) The cu...