Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...242(1)(d), cancelling the registration of a practitioner [or former practitioner] unless in its opinion the practitioner [or former practitioner] is, by reason of his or her conduct, not a fit and proper person to be a practitioner. (2) Except by consent, the Disciplinary Tribunal may not make – (a) an order, under section 242(1)(c), striking the name of a practitioner [or former practitioner] off the roll; … unless at least 5 members of the Disciplinary Tribunal are present an...

2. Central Standards Committee 3 v Mr P [2025] NZLCDT 37 (1 August 2025) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...her background as an OT social worker. [12] After a short delay, Mrs K met with Ms R, following which Ms R made a notification to OT. Mrs K was told this on 10 June. Another social worker, Ms T from OT, contacted Mrs K to follow up and sought consent to visit the children at school, which Mrs K gave. [13] After meeting with the children at school, Ms T, the OT social worker, asked Mrs K to ensure that there was no contact between the children and their father because OT was...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 125 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education [pdf, 607 KB]

   KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v MINISTER OF EDUCATION (IN RESPECT OF THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION) [2024] NZEmpC 125 [10 July 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 125 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations A

4. Waitangi Tribunal - Mangatū Remedies Report [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 8 1 4 T H E M A N G A T Ū R E M E D I E S R E

5. [2013] NZEmpC 97 Transpacific Industries v Harris and Green [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...Transpacific’s customers, cl 7.2. This provides: 7.2 During the term of your employment with us and for the periods and areas set out in Schedule C following the termination of employment you shall not (except on behalf of or with the prior written consent of the Employer, which will not unreasonably be withheld), either directly or indirectly on your behalf or on behalf of others: Solicit, divert, appropriate to or accept on behalf of any competing business; or Attempt t...

6. CAC 20003 v Jhagroo [2014] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...were four witnesses for the prosecution, namely, Mr Leslie Divers, the solicitor for the vendors; Ms C E Hope, an investigator for the prosecutor; and Mr and Mrs Kamhara the would-be purchasers, although Mr Kamhara’s written brief was adduced by consent and Mrs Kamhara confirmed and expanded her brief by phone from Australia by consent. The Evidence of Mr Divers [24] Mr Divers first met the vendor, Mrs Siavalua, on 27 February 2007 when she and her husband were contemplating sel...

7. Love v Samuel and Sharon Gemmell Whanau Trust - Anatohia Section 90C Block XVIII Gore SD [2016] Chief Judge's MB 122 (2016 CJ 122) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...the Māori Trustee as required by subsection (8) of the said section AND WHEREAS the Maori Trustee has within the time fixed by subsection (3) of the said section for public inspection of the said draft consolidated order, filed in the Court his consent to the acquisition of the said interests in terms of the said recommendation IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interests in the said land of the persons whose names and relative shares are set out in the said Schedule be and the same a...

8. Submissions Analysis of the Exposure Draft Amendment Bill for Phase 2 of the AML/CFT Reforms [pdf, 8 MB]

   ...conducted to the relevant standard the lack of an ongoing relationship should not act as a barrier to the reporting entity relying on the customer due diligence undertaken by the third party.  In section 33(2)(d) stating that entity B either consents to conducting customer due diligence or where entity B has already conducted customer due diligence they can confirm that customer due diligence has been conducted to the standard required by the Act or that of an equivalent AML/CFT regi...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 234 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...the employees were to work.4 1 In a joint memorandum dated 31 August 2021, and as recorded in the Court’s minute of 1 September 2021, the plaintiff agreed to withdraw the claims against the fifth defendant, Paramjit Kaur. 2 In an agreed statement of facts dated 31 August 2021. 3 Labour Inspector v Samra Holdings Ltd t/a Te Puna Liquor Centre [2021] NZEmpC 149. 4 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 65(2)(a)(iv). [5] The Court has also held that Sukhdev Singh was a per...

10. Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 4 [pdf, 286 KB]

    ...was, according to Mr Shelton, “no longer valid”, and allowed the appellant the opportunity to pursue her proper remedies by reviewing the second decision under the 1982 Act. [41] Appropriately it was noted by Ms Bedford that Mr Barker’s statement that he was modifying ACC’s decision by consent is not based on any consent by the appellant, but only the consent of ACC. [42] Also as Ms Bedford has noted, the above submissions only cover the jurisdictional issue. The merits...