12987 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 699 APPLICANT UM RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: BD are to pay UM the sum of $1293.71 by no later than 20 January 2025. Reasons: 1. UM hired a car from BD on 28 July 2024. UM paid the 20 day rental fee of $1481.80, which included a zero excess, in advance. 2. Within approximately 5 minutes of driving the vehi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 632 APPLICANT KT RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd pay KT $214.50 on or before 22 December 2023. KT is to return the lockset on receipt of the refund. Reasons 1. KT purchased a fender and lockset from D Ltd for $429.00 being parts from a [car]. KT says that the parts he purchased are not of acceptable quality. He claim...
...resolves an application by the first plaintiff, Mr Halse, for judgment by default against the defendant, the Hamilton City Council. The application is made on the ground that the Hamilton City Council has failed to file a statement of claim. [2] For the reasons explained, Mr Halse’s application is dismissed. It could have been struck out. Mr Halse challenges a determination of the Authority [3] Mr Halse is dissatisfied with a determination of the Employment Relations...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 263 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT NL The Tribunal orders: 1. The name of the respondent is amended to NL and HI in partnership trading as NC, to reflect the correct legal entity. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC requested that NL provide a full balayage (technique of foils and bleach). It was agreed that the price would be $...
Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 526 APPLICANT MQ RESPONDENT N Inc The Tribunal orders: N Inc is to pay MQ $106.00 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. In June 2023, MQ entered into an agreement with N Inc to hire their premises for her son’s 21st birthday. 2. After the event, MQ advised N Inc that she was unhappy with several things on the night of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 249 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: M Ltd is ordered to pay S Ltd the sum of $3,682.08. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 28 March 2024. Reasons: 1) On 29 September 2022 the applicant ordered a forklift from the respondent. The forklift had to be sourced by the respondent from overseas. The...
...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 439 APPLICANT DB APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT R Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The Applicant’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The 1st and 2nd Applicants (the Applicant/s) made a booking through the D Ltd website on around 15 February 2023 to fly from [International city 1] to [International city 2] (with D Ltd), and from [International city 2] to [New Zealand city] (with D Ltd). The...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 162 APPLICANT BD Ltd RESPONDENT QC Inc The Tribunal orders: QC Inc is to pay $500.00 to BD Ltd on or before 28 October 2022. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. BB was appointed Manager of the QC Inc around 10 years ago. She received $500.00/month for her duties as Manager. BB and her husband own a company cal...
...The Bill 4. The Bill repeals and replaces the Equal Pay Act 1972 and the Government Service Equal Pay Act 1960. It also makes amendments to the Employment Relations Act 2000. 5. The purpose of the Bill is to: a. promote enduring settlement of claims regarding sex discrimination on pay equity grounds b. provide for the elimination of existing and prevention of future sex discrimination in remuneration and other terms and conditions of employment c. set out the different processes...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 681 APPLICANT LG RESPONDENT HX The Tribunal orders: HX is to pay LG $16,500.00 within 28 days; and LG is to return the [Car], registration number [redacted], the subject of this dispute, to HX within 14 days of receipt of $16,500.00 from HX. HX did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] LG purchased a [Car] from HX. LG claims that H...