Search Results

1. Tana v Mahanga - Pukahakaha East 5B (2022) 255 Taitokerau MB 229 (255 TTK 229) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...of the Judicial Conference (being 8 July 2022).2 [6] Rule 4.2 of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 provides: 1 Applicant’s Submissions on Costs 1 November 2022, at [5]-[10]. 2 252 Taitokerau MB 171. 255 Taitokerau MB 231 4.2 Form of application or other proceeding (1) An application or other proceeding must be filed by using the appropriate form set out in the Schedule (2) The general form of application (see form 1) must be used if these rules do not require...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 200 Vaai v Moana Pacific Fisheries Ltd [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 200 [5 November 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 200 ARC 74/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out BETWEEN TUI VAAI Plaintiff AND MOANA PACIFIC FISHERIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 31 October 2014 Appearances: P Swarbrick and T Oldfield, counse...

3. OL v PS LCRO 246 / 2011 (14 August 2012) [pdf, 78 KB]

   LCRO 246/2011 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN MR OL Applicant AND MR PS Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] This review arises out of a complaint by Mr OL (the Applicant) against Mr PS (the Prac...

4. McDonald v Peters [2011] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 45 KB]

   ...under subsection (1), the parties to the adjudication must meet their own costs and expenses. [3] The claim against the council was that it failed to oversee the building certifier or check the building during or after construction. Prior applications [4] The first application for removal was unsuccessful as reported in Procedural Order No. 3 dated 17 August 2009. [5] After the council had filed its response to the claim on 3 September 2009 the council made a secon...

5. MM v UN Ltd [2024] NZDT 668 (22nd July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 668 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT UN Limited The Tribunal orders: UN Limited is to pay the sum of $1,885.80 to MM on or before 12 August 2024. Reasons: 1. In early October 2023, MM (the owner) booked UN Limited (the carrier) to move her household contents from her address in [Suburb A] to her new upstairs apartment address in [Suburb...

6. BN Ltd v DL [2020] NZDT 1517 (11 December 2020) [pdf, 178 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1517 APPLICANT BN Ltd RESPONDENT DL The Tribunal orders: DL is to pay the sum of $345.00 to BN Ltd on or before 15 January 2021. Reasons: 1. On 27 July 2020, following a telephone call from DL, BN Ltd emailed DL an estimate for the cost of moving the contents of her three-bedroom home from [Town 1] to [Town 2]. The estim...

7. Chand v Devi [2015] NZIACDT 74 (12 June 2015) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...person [30] The definition is directed to administrative tasks, such as keeping records, maintaining financial records and the like. [31] The definition deals specifically with the role an unlicensed person may have in the process of preparing applications for visas. They may record information “on any form, application, request, or claim on behalf and under the direction of another person”. [32] The natural meaning of those words is that the unlicensed person relying on the “...

8. KI v CT [2023] NZDT 125 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 125 APPLICANT KI RESPONDENT CT The Tribunal orders: CT is ordered to pay KI the sum of $4,473.50. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 30 June 2023. Reasons: 1) In January this year the applicant bought a caravan from the respondent. This was via ‘[online selling platform].’ The price paid was $26,902.00. 2) The...

9. EH v D Ltd [2022] NZDT 36 (10 January 2022) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 36 APPLICANT EH RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay the sum of $899.00 to EH on or before Monday 24 January 2022. 2. Once payment has been made, D Ltd may collect the furniture from EH at a mutually convenient time. If the goods have not been collected by 10 February 2022, EH may keep or dispose of...

10. DN v VM [2016] NZDT 971 (19 October 2016) [pdf, 21 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2016] NZDT 971 BETWEEN DN APPLICANT AND VM RESPONDENT Date of Order: 19 October 2016 Referee: Referee Brown ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] DN purchased a residential property from VM at an auction in December 2015. DN took possession on 5 February 2016. In May 2016 when the weather became cooler, DN tried to turn on the Bon-Air Vulcan...