12990 items matching your search terms
1 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6106: MARIE ELIZABETH LITCHFIELD AND GRAHAM WILLIAM WELLS – 2/485 DON BUCK ROAD, MASSEY ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Marie Litchfield and Graham Wells are the owners of a house at 2/455 Don Buck Road, Massey. Despite acc...
...checklist). The company was told it could contact investment experts directly on the required business plan. [10] From January to March 2013, the Shanghai company prepared a business plan for the visa application. The complainant confirmed the core information for the plan in a “Business Plan Information Summary” signed by him and provided to the company on 2 February 2013. A number of emails sent in March 2013 between the complainant and the company concerning the business...
...Manawa O Tūhoe Trust on 4 March 2019 as the Board Administrator. The position was sometimes called Board Secretary. She was employed by the Trust until 14 May 2021 when she was dismissed on the grounds of redundancy. [2] Ms McDonnell lodged a claim in the Employment Relations Authority alleging that the Trust’s decision to dismiss her was unjustified. That step constituted raising a personal grievance for an alleged unjustified dismissal. [3] An application for i...
...Ms Te Kooti however opposes Mr Mikus’ continuing involvement with the trust. She supports the earlier decision to remove Mr Mikus. [3] The issues for determination are firstly, whether or not a rehearing should be granted. Secondly, if that application succeeds, then whether or not the previous order removing Mr Mikus as a trustee should be annulled or affirmed. 246 Aotea MB 243 Procedural history [4] By way of background I note that in response to a question from th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 741 APPLICANT QQ RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay to QQ the sum of $245.44 on or before 24 October 2024. Reasons: 1. R Ltd operate a hotel in [Town]. 2. In June 2024, QQ was a guest at the hotel. 3. QQ paid for the room by way of credit card. 4. After his stay, QQ discovered that two addition...
...was referred to as “(You, Yourself, Your)”. [12] Clause 1 of the agreement set out the services provided by IPS: 1. Our Services 1.1 We will, upon instruction from Bruce Robert Cleland, Licensed Immigration Adviser, prepare and compile all information relating to your application for Immigration New Zealand (INZ) for a WORK VISA; 1.2 As part of this, WE will • Provide an initial assessment on visa options which apply to your situation. • Review all information and docume...
LCRO 202/2015 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN BT Applicant AND DG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr BT has applied for a review of the determination by [Area] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) to ta...
LCRO 151/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN DF of Auckland Applicant AND WW Of [North Island] Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] The Standards Committee considered two complaints made by Ms DF (the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 818 APPLICANT LG RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to pay LG the sum of $2249.00 on or before 5.00pm on 4th November 2024. Reasons: 1. J Ltd did not provide any contact details nor attend the hearing. I tried unsuccessfully to contact someone on the customer services number, to no avail. The absence of a party does not pre...
LCRO 31/2014 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN RX Applicant AND KL Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Miss RX has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] in which the Comm...