Search Results

1. [2025] NZREADT 05 - CAC 2204 v Cooper & Cooper Co Real Estate Ltd (17 February 2025) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...Government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Auckland moved to alert level 4 and on 22 September 2021 restrictions were relaxed slightly to alert level 3. [7] On 21 September 2021, after first telephoning Mr Cooper, Mr Callahan sent him an email requesting certain information by the end of the week. The email to Mr Cooper recorded his agreement to assist Mr Callahan with the enquiry into the complaint. Mr Callahan received no response from Mr Cooper or Cooper and Co. [8] Mr...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 38 Korean Air Lines Co., Limited v Locke [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 484/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to join a third party AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd to exclude evidence BETWEEN GREGORY ARON LOCKE Plaintiff AND RISHWORTH AVIATION ASIA PACIFIC LIMITED Defendan...

3. BM & IM v KX & Ors [2024] NZDT 162 (8 February 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...and purchase (“ASAP”) before speaking with MI Ltd or asking them to act on their behalf. 13. MI Ltd was sent a copy of the signed ASAP on 20 December 2019, their last business day of the year. Therefore it did not have any input into the form or content of the ASAP. 14. The front page of the agreement noted that there was no condition that required a LIM to be obtained. However, there was a further condition that the agreement was conditional upon: the approval in all res...

4. Cotter v Cotter - Tutaekuri B13 [2019] Chief Judge's MB 951 (2019 CJ 951) [pdf, 471 KB]

   2019 Chief Judge’s MB 951 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT A20170003832 CJ 2017/11 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tutaekuri B13 CONCERNING HURU COTTER Applicant AND RAWITI COTTER, JOHN RUEA COTTER, SHARLENE COTTER, PUKEHUIA COTTER, and RUSSELL MANAHI COTTER Respondents Hearing: 23 April 2019, 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 516-575 (Heard at Gisborne) Judgment: 6 September 2019...

5. [2017] EmpC 155 Quality Consumables v Hannah [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 155 [7 December 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 120/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN QUALITY CONSUMABLES LIMITED Plaintiff AND NICOLE HANNAH Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 31 October and 24 November 2017 Appearances: M Ryan, cou...

6. [2014] NZEmpc 85 McCartney v Atlas Concrete Ltd and First Union [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...rules?”. [3] The starting point is, therefore, the relevant rules of the Union at the time it declined to continue to represent Mr McCartney in the matter of his personal grievance with his former employer. [4] Mr Cranney has, at the Court’s request, supplied certified copies of the Union’s rules for the years 2007 and 2008. Those were then the rules of the National Distribution Union Inc (NDU) but the fact that the rights and obligations in law of the NDU have been assumed...

7. [2021] NZIACDT 18 - CL v Khetarpal (10 August 2021) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: No appearance Adviser: No appearance 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant, CL, was in New Zealand on a visitor visa and instructed the adviser, Ms Apurva Khetarpal, to file further visa applications. The adviser committed numerous breaches of her professional obligations, including providing dishonest and/or misleading information to both the complainant and to Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ). [2] A com...

8. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...[2024] NZLCRO 117 Ref: LCRO 35/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN UX1 Applicant AND RT Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant, Mrs UX, has applied for a review of a determination by the [Area] Stan...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 17 Morgan v Tranzit Coachlines Wairarapa Ltd [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...the defendant sought to rely. The plaintiff successfully applied for leave to file a reply out of time. A similar situation arises in this case. [3] The plaintiff seeks leave to file a reply and has filed a draft reply in support of the (informally advanced) application. The application is opposed by the defendant. It was agreed that the application could be dealt with on the papers. [4] The principles to be applied to applications to extend time are well accepted. They inc...

10. ACM Ltd v ZXS [2013] NZDT 113 (17 June 2013) [pdf, 55 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 113 BETWEEN ACM Ltd APPLICANT AND ZXS RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 June 2013 Referee: Referee Meyer ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZXS is to pay to ACM limited the sum of $862.50 by the 27th June 2013. Facts [1] ZXS contacted the Applicant (ACM Ltd) by email in November 2012 requesting a valuation of his motel premises in [a cit...