Search Results

1. MOJ0071-FEB22-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...has the right to have a say on things like name suppression, bail, home detention or parole. You can expect courteous, compassionate and respectful service from court officers, the Police and anyone else involved in the case. You have the right to privacy. Read the Victims Code to find out more about your rights and the treatment you can expect; go online to victimsinfo. govt.nz/en/home/ways-to-get-support/#step-1 If you think your rights haven’t been met, or you haven’t received t...

2. [2023] NZEmpC 231 Boyd v OJI [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...OJI v Boyd [2023] NZERA 579 at [1]; Boyd v OJI [2023] NZERA 425 at [2]; and Boyd v OJI [2023] NZERA 332 at [1]. coming forward.3 The material which will be put before the Court is also likely to include sensitive medical information, and privacy interests are engaged. [5] I will revisit the issue of whether permanent orders ought to be made at the hearing. In the meantime, interim non-publication orders are made prohibiting the publication of OJI’s name, medical informat...

3. Henaghan & Anor v CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...Committees under appeal. Section 108(1) reads: “108 Restrictions on publication (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make 1 or more of the following orders: (a) an order prohibiting the publication of any report or account of any part of any proceedings before it, whether held in public...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 135 Board of Trustees of Southland Boys High School v Jackson [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...hearing, which is set down for two days on 19 and 20 August 2021. Access is sought to enable reporting of the proceedings in advance of the hearing. As the Rules make clear, before the substantive hearing the protection of confidentiality and privacy interests and the orderly and fair administration of justice may require that access to documents be limited.4 [6] I infer that the request for access is limited to the statement of claim, which sets out the grounds for the plaintiff�...

5. 2023 NZPSPLA 076 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...(ii) Mr Campbell is officially reprimanded. (iii) Mr Campbell is to apologise in writing to Mr SW and provide confirmation that he has done so to the Authority no later than 31 December 2023. (iv) Mr Campbell must undergo training in the area of privacy law within the next twelve months and provide evidence of his having done so to the Authority. REASONS [1] In July 2023 Craig Andrew Campbell, under the employment of Argyle Security Group (NZ) Ltd (Argyle), installed a secur...

6. NZBORA-Advice-NZ-EU-FTA-Legislation-Bill-For-Publication.pdf [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, correspondence or otherwise. The right protects an amalgam of values including property, personal freedom, privacy, and dignity. The touchstone of this section is the protection of reasonable expectations of privacy, although it does not provide a general protection of personal privacy.6 15. Clause 84 introduces new sections 88 and 89 into the Act w...

7. BORA New Zealand Infrastructure Commission/Te Waihanga Bill [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...ability to gather information. 11. Further, we note these limitations apply to public service departments, departmental agencies, and Crown entities, rather than individuals. The power also precludes personal information (as defined in s 2(1) of the Privacy Act 1993) and a request for information may be refused in order to uphold legal professional privilege or if the supply of the information would limit the ability of the entity to act judicially or carry out its statutorily independe...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 49 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...access being granted. Dr Norris’s report is expressed at a relatively high level, reflecting the questions the report writer was asked to express an expert opinion on by the Court. It does not identify any individuals and no confidentiality or privacy issues are engaged.3 [9] Standing back and considering the matters in rr 12 and 13, I consider it appropriate to grant the application and I make orders accordingly. Christina Inglis Chief Judge...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 50 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...access being granted. Dr Norris’s report is expressed at a relatively high level, reflecting the questions the report writer was asked to express an expert opinion on by the Court. It does not identify any individuals and no confidentiality or privacy issues are engaged.3 [9] Standing back and considering the matters in rr 12 and 13, I consider it appropriate to grant the application, and I make orders accordingly. Christina Inglis Chief Judg...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 31 Zara's Turkish Ltd v Kocaturk [pdf, 357 KB]

    ...Buckett, counsel for Zara’s Turkish, amended the application to remove references to oral communication, which could not have formed part of an order for discovery in any event. MBIE opposed the application and, in doing so, relied on Privacy Principle 11 from the Privacy Act 1993.1 MBIE also challenged the scope of the application as unnecessarily broad. [4] To place the application into context a brief comment is necessary about the Employment Relations Authority’s...