TR v NI LCRO 109 / 2011 (21 February 2013) [pdf, 199 KB]
...claim was well-founded and could be supported. [76] Following receipt of the plaintiff’s briefs of evidence, CCL responded with observations as to what they considered were weaknesses in TR and TS’s claim. These included: The claim for consequential loss was speculative and no valuation evidence had been adduced. The details of the proposed amendment to the Statement of Claim would not assist the plaintiffs and any additional costs incurred by them by reason of changes to...