Search Results

Search results for NZEmpC 153.

214 items matching your search terms

  1. [2024] NZEmp 56 KiwiRail Ltd v Rail & Maritime Transport Union Inc [pdf, 303 KB]

    KIWIRAIL LIMITED v RAIL AND MARITIME TRANSPORT UNION INCORPORATED [2024] NZEmpC 56 [27 March 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 56 EMPC 265/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KIWIRAIL LIMITED Plaintiff AND RAIL AND MARITIME TRANSPORT UNION INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing:...

  2. Grigorovich v Stapleton (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...concerning the circumstances of the termination of his employment with Babbage, Mr Grigorovich “applied” to the ERA for the resolution of the grievance in terms of s 79A of the HRA. In Wang v Hamilton Multicultural Services Trust 920090 [2010] NZEmpC 142, (2011) 9 NZELR 404, applying to the ERA was described by the Employment Court, in the context of the choice of procedures, as a “point of irrevocability”. [22] The withdrawal by Mr Grigorovich of his application to the ERA has...

  3. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

    ...unusual step of allowing recovery of legal costs arising before proceeding being issued. Accordingly we order that Police pay the plaintiff’s claimed pecuniary losses in the amount of $4,560.33. 26 Butler v Ohope Chartered Club Inc [2021] NZEmpC 80; (2021) 18 NZELR 186 at [39]. 27 NOP v Chief Executive, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2014] NZHRRT 16 at [25]. https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/cases-nz/id/6580-9RK1-JBM1-M0PT-00000-00?cite=Butler%20v...

  4. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...straightforward process. The facts do not call for observations to be made about the application of those principles in the context of social networking sites. Contrast Senior v Police [2013] NZFLR 356 (HC) and Hook v Stream Group (NZ) Pty Ltd [2013] NZEmpC 188 at [29] to [37]. A further point to be made is that the manner in which the case has been framed by the parties has made it unnecessary for the Tribunal to consider the possible application of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act...