You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description.
  • If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
Search results

440 items matching your search terms

  1. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Brill [2022] NZLCDT 13 (16 May 2022) [PDF, 109 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct for practising outside terms of practising certificate by providing pro bono regulated services to the public, and unsatisfactory conduct for failing to provide client service information and act independently / failed to advise NZLS of his involvement in litigation when corresponding about status of practising certificate / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 9 / HELD / aggravating features include failure to disclose involvement in litigation, absolute duty of candour required and NZLS was misled / strong mitigating feature includes over 50-year career without previous blemish, services to community, and acted not for personal gain but desire to help his neighbours / more serious than comparable cases due to experience and on-notice of the issue / Tribunal ordered censure, $7,500 fine / practitioner to pay 75 per cent of Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs

  2. Southland Standards Committee v P [2022] NZLCDT 12 (28 April 2022) [PDF, 215 KB]

    Charges / no case to answer / practitioner charged concerning five elderly clients / Hall v Wellington Standards Committee (No. 2) [2013] NZAR 743 (HC) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 240A / HELD / necessary for Tribunal to determine whether evidence sufficient to establish charge / basis for misconduct charges not established / no evidential foundation for overcharging / satisfied client competent to give instructions / no jurisdictional impediment to Tribunal hearing remaining unsatisfactory conduct charges / Tribunal may strike out charges that do not justify disciplinary sanction / no disciplinary sanction required / no reasonable basis to find against practitioner on fee complaint / particulars alleging wrong-doing with Powers of Attorney disclose no reasonable cause of action / minor infractions might arise in any busy practice without alarm / all charges dismissed / Standards Committee must pay Tribunal costs / costs between parties reserved

  3. National Standards Committee 1 v Haines [2022] NZLCDT 10 (8 April 2022) [PDF, 551 KB]

    Liability / four sets of charges / overcharging / issued inflated $1 million invoice to enhance voting power as client’s creditor / proper purpose / charged $1,000 per hour fee without client care information / lack of time records / conflict of interest / client provided security & guarantees / loans from client / no independent advice / received fees directly rather than to firm on trust without receipt or invoice or reporting on minimal progress / ongoing police investigation / applied funds for own use / abuse of trust / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2 / rule 2.1 / rule 3.4 / rule 3.6 / rule 5 / rule 5.1 / rule 5.4 / rule 5.4.3 / rule 5.4.4 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / rule 9.2 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, reg 9 / reg 10 / HELD / not Tribunal’s role to undertake fee revision in the absence of gross overcharging / one charge dismissed, other charges proved as misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct

  4. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Holland [2022] NZLCDT 9 (3 March 2022) [PDF, 216 KB]

    Liability / misconduct in managing parents’ estates and affairs / conduct unconnected with the provision of regulated services / breaches of fiduciary duties (including profiting), failure to maintain adequate records, failure to account / whether fit and proper person or suited to practice as a lawyer / HELD / practitioner owed fiduciary duties administering estates and affairs / reckless in handling father’s estate, caused losses to estate / has never produced mother’s will / made unsecured loans to herself and sister, who were both financial risks / brother received no share of father’s estate / previous misconduct finding for not complying with s 147 notice / has not produced records to demonstrate distributions / under a duty to account / failed to have proper regard to siblings’ interests / failed to recognise extent she imperiled mother’s position and hampered brother’s ability to obtain residuary share / s 7(1)(b)(ii) test met / charges proven

  5. National Standards Committee 2 v Mr Y [2022] NZLCDT 8 (24 February 2022) [PDF, 202 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct for intimate relationship with client, then denying relationship during complaint / practitioner conceded misconduct / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 5.7.1 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 240 / HELD / lawyer briefly represented client in family law matters / client’s husband complained / lawyer dishonestly denied relationship, an aggravating feature and significant misconduct / later made a self-report / no gross breach of trust, but relationship can compromise objectivity / retainer supervised, lawyer stepped back quickly / mitigating features include unblemished career, conduct out of character, remorse, self-report / Tribunal ordered four months’ suspension / final name suppression order / interests of rehabilitation outweigh public knowing name / no risk to community, purposes of disciplinary regime achieved / apology ordered / practitioner to pay Standards Committee and Tribunal costs

  6. Nelson Standards Committee v Downing and Reith [2022] NZLCDT 7 (17 February 2022) [PDF, 241 KB]

    Liability / duty to complete retainer / fees payment and security for fees / advice regarding legal aid, litigation risk and whether fees may exceed recovery / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 4.2 / rule 9.5 / rule 11 / HELD / lawyers terminated retainer 4 weeks before JSC / not entitled to terminate, fees deferred and 7 day notice to pay arbitrary, left client stranded / did not fulfil fiduciary duties on termination  / s 7(1)(a)(ii) test met / client signed deed acknowledging debt, providing security, did not receive legal advice or explanation about effect / demand for payment and threatening interactions reprehensible / s 7(1)(a)(i) test met / failed to advise about possibility of legal aid and that fees may exceed recovery / should suggest client may be eligible for legal aid and refer to further resources / failed to re-evaluate litigation prospects once estate diminished / unsatisfactory conduct found s 12(a) / charges proved

  7. Otago Standards Committee v Duff [2022] NZLCDT 4 (21 January 2022) [PDF, 103 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct / assisted a person to avoid GST, failed to account for GST, miscoded accounts / business dealing unconnected with legal services / whether suspension from practise necessary to mark seriousness, denounce conduct and signal standards of integrity required of lawyers in all business dealings / HELD / conduct not most serious, involves private business arrangements / aggravating features include long delay in failing to pay GST and previous unsatisfactory conduct finding / mitigating feature include full payment of GST and penalties, no harm to clients and outsourced accounting responsibilities / positive references go beyond usual references, include senior criminal jury work in South Auckland, and mentoring young Māori and Pacifica lawyers / practitioner fit and proper, preventing him from doing so would risk serious loss to clients and employees /  Tribunal ordered censure, $10,000 fine / practitioner to pay Standard’s Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs 

  8. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Brill [2022] NZLCDT 3 (21 January 2022) [PDF, 557 KB]

    Liability / charged with practising outside terms of practising certificate by providing pro bono regulated services to the public, and failing to provide client service information and act independently / represented his wife and eight others in litigation before courts / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 9 / section 69 / section 94 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 5 / rule 5.6 / HELD / misconduct found per s 9 / practitioner employed, not entitled to practice on own account / putting issue of wife to one side, other parties clearly constituted “the public” / clients exposed to significant adverse costs award including an uplift for practitioner’s conduct / breaches of rr 3.4, 3.5 and 5 are unsatisfactory conduct per ss 12(a) or 12(b)(ii) / charges under s 7(1)(a)(iii) a duplication of s 9 charges / misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct proved

  9. National Standards Committee 1 v Gardner-Hopkins [2022] NZLCDT 2 (13 January 2022) [PDF, 211 KB]

    Penalty / found guilty of six charges of misconduct for six incidents of exploitative sexual contact with five different women at two work events / partner in law firm offended against summer clerks / seriousness of conduct / aggravating features / mitigating factors / strike-off starting point / HELD / misconduct serious, somewhat below Horsley or Daniels cases, where practitioners were suspended three years / aggravating features include repetition, power imbalance, incalculable impact on victims, and intention to get drunk / mitigating features include consequences already incurred, changes made, and financial circumstances / has previously minimised his responsibility, but relatively recent changes in accepting accountability are positive although belated / financial circumstances not defining nor as dire as claimed / caused reputation damage to profession / Tribunal ordered censure and two-year suspension / practitioner to pay Standards Committee’s costs  and Tribunal costs

  10. National Standards Committee 1 v Reed [2021] NZLCDT 31 (2 December 2021) [PDF, 122 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct / duty of candour / failure to disclose relevant information to High Court in without notice application / whether suspension necessary / HELD / one-off reckless breach / no deliberate omission / no aggravating features / no prior disciplinary history / unable to cope with growth of sole practice / merged with large law firm to manage capacity, disclosed investigation, acknowledged failings and has support and supervision / Tribunal considered no risk of practitioner repeating conduct / high level of remorse, insight and responsibility for actions / practitioner incurred significant cost in disciplinary proceedings / notable community involvement and pro bono contributions / practitioner sought to use experience to educate young women about learning from mistakes / suspension not necessary / Tribunal ordered censure and $15,000 fine / practitioner to pay Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs / interim suppression order of practitioner’s name discharged

  11. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v Jacobsen [2021] NZLCDT 28 (1 November 2021) [PDF, 108 KB]

    Penalty / practitioner admitted two charges of misconduct and found guilty of another / conveyancing transaction involving transfer of property owned by practitioner mother to company owned by the practitioner and her husband / practitioner then borrowed additional money against the property / conflict of interest / failing to protect client’s interests / misleading conduct / appropriate penalty / HELD / practitioner did not present risk to other clients or public / no need for fine or censure / features of misconduct (inattention to practitioner’s mother and securing additional funds against the property) understandable although grievous / Tribunal ordered 10-week suspension / practitioner to pay Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs

  12. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v O'Boyle [2021] NZLCDT 27 (29 October 2021) [PDF, 170 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct for sending letters containing false allegations and speculation to employers of people involved in family court case / HELD / Standards Committee’s penalty submissions focused on a punitive outcome / penalty can pursue more than one goal / Tribunal needs to disapprove of misconduct, but compensation and rehabilitation also relevant / practitioner needs to be challenged about her practice and to account for her choices / required to undertake professional supervision for a minimum of one year / ordered to compensate each victim $3,000 / Tribunal ordered six-week suspension / practitioner to pay Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs