You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Courts website and search for 'Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority'.
58 items matching your search terms
Complaint that large retailer was employing property guards who do not hold certificates – s9 definition of property guard excludes those guarding premises owned or occupied by themselves – the retailer is not required to hold a licence and its security guards are not required to have certificates if only providing security on premises occupied by their employer – leave to file complaint refused.
Complaint against security guard and his employer for attempting to apprehend a shop lifter – breach of good practice is not sufficient to amount to misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct – complaint dismissed.
Individual licence holder provided incorrect information to support application to add classes to his licence – breach of s 44 by working as a crowd controller without a certificate – formal warning given and application to add classes declined.
Complaint of trading without a licence sent for investigation – complaint upheld but as company now held appropriate licence no further action taken.
Complaint against a certificate holder- using company fuel card for personal purchases amounts to misconduct – certificate cancelled.
is no longer suitable to be a certificate holder because he is a patched member of the Rebels MC
recent drug convictions & associate of a gang – s 83(ab) no longer suitable to hold a COA – COA cancelled.
Complaint – recent disqualifying conviction makes COA holder unsuitable to hold a certificate – COA cancelled
complaint on character grounds – gang membership – no longer suitable to hold a certificate – certificate cancelled.
Complaint after disqualifying firearms conviction – COA cancelled
Complaint – no longer suitable to be a security worker after a series of drunken violent incidents – COA suspended with conditions for reinstatement.
Police complaint that certificate holder is no longer suitable to carry on a security business – multiple warrants for arrest, breaches of court imposed sanctions and warnings issued – certificate and company licence cancelled.
No factual or legal basis to complaint. The complaint is dismissed.
Complaint of serious misconduct after COA holder made a covert recording in his workplace –certificate holder had been discharged without conviction in District Court – actions amount to misconduct but no further penalty warranted.
Complaint of misconduct & failure to display or produce ID – Private Investigators not required to display ID and only have to produce it on request – recording of interaction established no basis to complaint – complaint dismissed.
Police compliant under s 83(ab) – certificate holder no longer suitable to be a security worker due to becoming a patched member of the Head Hunters – First rule of the Head Hunters is not to cooperate with the Police – Complaint upheld and COA cancelled.
Complaint by Police based on serious disqualifying convictions and gang membership – certificate cancelled
Police complaint – disqualifying convictions and misconduct while working as a security guard – certificate cancelled.
Police complaint – s 83(ab) no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – history of dishonesty offences but no convictions – certificate cancelled
Complaint about employment investigator working without a licence of certificate – investigator engaged by government department therefore not required to hold a licence under s 5(4) – leave to file complaint declined.
Complaint – no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – mental health issues and failure to engage with treatment – COA cancelled.
Complaint based on disqualifying convictions and gang membership – COA cancelled.
Police complaint after disqualifying conviction – COA cancelled.
Complaint by member of the public against private investigator – failure to wear ID – alleged breach of Code of Conduct as recorded conversation without permission - no statutory or factual basis for the complaint – leave refused.
Complaint about company and its officer– company officer does not have required training and experience and company now removed – licence cancelled – application for COA declined.