Search Results

1. [2012] NZCA 25 CA562/2011 Service Food Workers Union v Cerebos Greggs Ltd [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...second is jurisdictional – does this Court have power to determine the substantive question? Normally, these issues 1 Cerebos Gregg’s Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota [2011] NZEmpC 55. 2 Service and Food Workers Union Nga Ringa Tota v Cerebos Gregg’s Ltd [2011] NZCA 431; Employment Relations Act 2000, s 214. would be determined in the reverse order. But, given the way this Court’s approach to its st...

2. DIJ v New Zealand Police [2024] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...unusual step of allowing recovery of legal costs arising before proceeding being issued. Accordingly we order that Police pay the plaintiff’s claimed pecuniary losses in the amount of $4,560.33. 26 Butler v Ohope Chartered Club Inc [2021] NZEmpC 80; (2021) 18 NZELR 186 at [39]. 27 NOP v Chief Executive, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2014] NZHRRT 16 at [25]. https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/cases-nz/id/6580-9RK1-JBM1-M0PT-00000-00?cite=Butler%20v...

3. [2011] NZCA 595 CA439/2011 New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...of, or taking, industrial action, attend mediation providing that the mediation can occur within a reasonable timeframe (a reasonable timeframe would 1 New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union v New Zealand Fire Service Commission [2011] NZEmpC 80. normally be considered to be 14 days). The parties will agree on the mediation service and mediator to be used, and on the issues to be discussed. … 11. APPLICATION OF THIS AGREED PROCESS FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING (a) Th...

4. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...straightforward process. The facts do not call for observations to be made about the application of those principles in the context of social networking sites. Contrast Senior v Police [2013] NZFLR 356 (HC) and Hook v Stream Group (NZ) Pty Ltd [2013] NZEmpC 188 at [29] to [37]. A further point to be made is that the manner in which the case has been framed by the parties has made it unnecessary for the Tribunal to consider the possible application of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act...