Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.

Find out more about using the decision finder. 

View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.

Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.

There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.

Search results

798 items matching your search terms

  1. INZ Calder v Ahmed [2019] NZIACDT 35 (23 May 2019) sanctions [PDF, 161 KB]

    Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / Immigration New Zealand (Calder) v Ahmed [2019] NZIADCT 18 / allowing unlicensed  person to give immigration advice / rubber stamping / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e and cl3c / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor’s actions serious / adviser did have involvement with clients / misunderstanding of “clerical work” exception / Immigration New Zealand (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 16 / s511a / advisor censured / s511b / required to complete training / s511f / fined
  2. KIT v Zhu [2019] NZIACDT 34 (20 May 2019) [PDF, 176 KB]

    Breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / student and visitor visa applications / failure to provide written agreement to client / adviser did not engage with client / adviser did not keep complete file notes / s442e of the Act  / breach of Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl18a, cl26aiii and cl26c / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / unlicensed staff processed application / adviser did not personally obtain client’s instructions / no written agreement / adviser failed to keep file notes / complaint upheld.
  3. MG v Hu [2019] NZIACDT 33 (17 May 2019) [PDF, 118 KB]

    Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / MG v Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 / long term business vis / conflict of interest / advisor acted for vendor of business and client / party to providing false information to Immigration New Zealand (INZ) / Code of Conduct 2014, cl11b / cl15a and cl3a / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auclkand CVI-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor accepts responsibility for breaches of the Code of Conduct / further breaches unlikely / advisor has taken steps to ensure compliance with obligations/ s51a / advisor cautioned.
  4. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 32 (14 May 2019) Sanctions [PDF, 238 KB]

    Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIADCT 19 / seminars / allowing unlicensed  person to give immigration advice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 and cl3c / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor’s actions serious / s511a / advisor censured / s511e / prohibited from reapplying for licence  for two years / required to complete training before reapplying for licence / s511f / fined
  5. Abellera v Elizabeth [2019] NZIACDT 31 (13 May 2019) [PDF, 94 KB]

    Final decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / interim decision Abellera v Elizabeth [2017] NZIACDT 17 / breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / failure to tailor written agreement to client / failure to issue refund / demand to withdraw complaint in exchange for refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl19e cl24a and cl24e / adviser apologised and accepted responsibility / refund issued / no further sanction appropriate / complaint upheld.
  6. Suresh v Elizabeth [2019] NZIACDT 30 (10 May 2019) [PDF, 197 KB]

    Rubber stamping / breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / failure to tailor written agreement to client / delays in preparing EOI / lack of refund policy / failure to refund / s442a of the Act  / negligence / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl19e, cl19k and cl24 / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / adviser did not have any involvement with file / unlicensed staff processed application / obligations cannot be delegated / agreement not tailored to client’s circumstances  / delay in preparing EOI unreasonable and negligent / advisor failed to offer a fair and reasonable refund / complaint upheld
  7. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 29 (9 May 2019) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / Singh v Patel [2019] NZIADCT 17 / failed to make a record of meetings and discussions with client / failed to confirm material discussions in writing / Code of Conduct 2014, cl26aiii and cl26c / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor aware of need to improve file management / advisor has taken steps to ensure compliance with obligations / s50b / no further sanctions are warranted
  8. Van Zyl v McNeil [2019] NZIACDT 27 (8 May 2019) [PDF, 109 KB]

    Immigration adviser in breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / four heads of complaint alleged / misleading or dishonest conduct / s442d of the Act / failure to pay refund promised / failure to maintain all communications in required manner / failure to provide written communications for inspection / Code of Conduct 2014, cl24b & cl24c, cl26aiii and cl26e / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / insufficient evidence of dishonest or misleading conduct / adviser failed to promptly provide promised refund / adviser breached written agreement with complainant / sufficient record of communications with clients existed / complaint upheld.
  9. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [PDF, 186 KB]

    Breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / delays in lodging EOI and communicating with complainant / failure to maintain and make available client file for inspection / s571c of the Act  / lack of professionalism, due care and diligence / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 and cl26e / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / EOI lodgement delays resulted in complainant missing automatic selection / communication delays were unreasonable / client file retained by adviser’s former employer / adviser must make reasonable efforts to obtain file / Jiang v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2018] NZHC 3152 / file was that of the firm and not the adviser / advisers obligation under cl26e to provide file to Authority must be consistent with s571c / complaint upheld.
  10. GZ v Ke (Luke) Lu [2019] NZIACDT 26 (6 May 2019) [PDF, 113 KB]

    Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / GZ v Lu [2019] NZIADCT 15 / rubber stamping / adviser allowed unlicensed people to provide immigration advice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 and cl3c / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / issues of punishment and deterrence also considered / adviser’s actions were isolated and at lower end of disciplinary spectrum / acts not intentional / adviser was proactive in resolving complaint and correcting business practices / adviser cautioned / additional (online) training ordered.
  11. INZ (Calder) v Cleland [2019] NZIACDT 25 (3 May 2019) [PDF, 252 KB]

    Rubber stamping / six heads of complaint relating to 12 clients / Immigration adviser’s business practice contrary to professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / s7 and s5 of the Act / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl18b, cl19e & cl19f and cl26b / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / lack of professionalism and due care / failure to engage with clients / unlicensed staff providing immigration advice, not just clerical work / significant matters in agreement not discussed with clients / full description of services and fees not specified in agreement / failure to provide ongoing timely updates to clients on immigration applications / complaint upheld.
  12. Shihaku v Mizoguchi [2019] NZIACDT 24 (24 April 2019) [PDF, 169 KB]

    Failure to properly manage refund of fee / unprofessional negotiations / no signed agreement of confirmed acceptance / complainant cancelled services & requested refund / adviser insisted on full & final settlement condition before paying refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl18c, cl 24c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / previous complaints upheld by Tribunal / Tribunal’s statutory authority cannot be ousted by agreement between the parties / registrar’s views on protection of public carries considerable weight in Tribunal / adviser acknowledged breaches in joint statement with registrar which Tribunal accepted / conduct stemmed from lack of understanding of professional obligations / adviser undertaking training & improved systems & processes / complaint upheld / adviser prevented from applying for any form of licence other than provisional licence for 12 months following completion of training / adviser censured & ordered to pay balance of fee to complainant.
  13. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 23 (23 April 2019) [PDF, 163 KB]

    Sanctions decision / unprofessional & disrespectful communications with INZ / adviser made personal attacks against individual officers / adviser withheld information from client / adviser copied unconnected people in confidential client correspondence / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / government agencies should not be unduly sensitive to criticism / communications crossed disciplinary threshold but not at upper end of unprofessional communications or malicious / withholding information isolated incident & did not cause decline of application / adviser refused to get clients’ consent to copy other people in correspondence / potential violations aggravated by contempt of code & disciplinary regime / adviser censured & ordered to pay $2,500 penalty.
  15. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 21 (15 April 2019) [PDF, 119 KB]

    Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / all communications made via Chinese migration company / staff work not clerical work / bulk of complainant’s instructions carried out by company / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / second complaint upheld / adviser already prohibited from licence for two years / misconduct serious / adviser enabled unlicensed persons to provide immigration advice & failed to personally discharge immigration services / violation not wilful / adviser believed Chinese law did not permit him to engage with complainant / adviser wrongly believed staff were performing permitted clerical work / adviser retired & licence expired / adviser censured & prevented from reapplying for licence for two years.
  16. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [PDF, 152 KB]

    Failure to engage with client / failure to deal with conflict of interest appropriately / long term business visa / complainant (client) purchaser of a business / adviser did not deal directly with complainant / adviser relied on vendor of business to be an intermediary / information provided in business proposal inaccurate / adviser sent emotional text to complainant after complaint made / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2, cl3, cl6 / clear conflict of interest but no breach of cl6 / vendor an agent but not a client / adviser accepted instructions from conflicted intermediary but lack of due care & professionalism not part of complaint so no breach / lack of engagement with client cannot be excused by client consent / obligation to engage with client cannot be waived / adviser’s key failure accepting an intermediary & not personally engaging with complainant / text unprofessional but did not cross disciplinary threshold / complaint upheld.
  17. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [PDF, 306 KB]

    Facilitating unlicensed person to give unlawful immigration advice / adviser ran seminars overseas providing information on immigration criteria in New Zealand / speaker at seminars not licensed / complaint made by another adviser that seminars contained incorrect information / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl29 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / no evidence adviser’s strategy for clients not viable / motive of complainant irrelevant / immigration advice given by unlicensed person / irrelevant that speaker licensed in Germany to give advice about New Zealand immigration / adviser endorsed strategy & seminars traded on adviser being licensed in New Zealand / adviser facilitated speaker’s behaviour / complaint upheld.
  18. INZ (Calder) v Ahmed [2019] NZIACDT 18 (2 April 2019) [PDF, 225 KB]

    Rubber stamping / allowing unlicensed people to manage visa application process / adviser based in Pakistan & director of immigration consultancy / staff from consultancy communicated with clients & INZ / adviser assessed eligibility of clients & involved at various times during application process / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / most of engagement undertaken by staff / adviser’s mode of business allowed staff to perform substantive immigration services / staff communications with clients not minor & crossed disciplinary threshold / adviser not professional or diligent / adviser delegated bulk of engagement process to staff / not enough to be engaged in some key stages / complaint upheld.
  19. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 17 (28 March 2019) [PDF, 142 KB]

    Excessive fees / failure to record meetings and discussions / residence application / adviser charged $15,000 standard fee / adviser prepared application which required analysis of financial information / complainant signed application & paid second instalment of fees / complainant changed his mind & requested withdrawal of application & full refund of fees / complainant terminated agreement / adviser offered a partial refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl20, cl24, cl26 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser should have recorded material discussions in writing / fee at higher end of scale but not unfair or unreasonable / urgency relevant factor in setting fee / adviser carried out substantial work at time agreement was terminated / work largely completed & only some documents outstanding / refund fair / adviser under no obligation to refund more than small part of fee / complaint upheld.
  20. INZ (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2019) [PDF, 126 KB]

    Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / allowing unlicensed people to manage visa application process / adviser entered arrangements with companies that sourced jobs for Sri Lankan & Filipino workers / failure to personally engage with each client / adviser had little or no contact with clients / lack of clarity as to respective responsibilities of company & adviser / adviser facilitated provision of immigration advice by unlicensed staff / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser negligent but breach not deliberate / adviser careless as to contractual arrangements & misunderstood limits of clerical work exclusion / adviser overlooked template agreement not suited to her or clients’ needs / adviser censured, ordered to undertake refresher course & pay penalty of $4,000.
  21. GZ v Lu [2019] NZIACDT 15 (15 March 2019) [PDF, 146 KB]

    Rubber stamping / adviser director of company providing student placement services / complainant & son applied for visitor visa before student visa / unlicensed staff prepared application / application declined because it did not disclose son’s placement offer & INZ concerned it was not genuine / adviser not involved with application but finalised letter in response to INZ concerns / adviser not involved in management of company & believed it only provided placement services / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / any competent adviser would have realised unlicensed staff providing advice on receiving draft response letter / business structure not designed to circumvent legislation & no pattern of misconduct / violation at lower end of rubber stamping spectrum but still serious / adviser facilitated conduct of unlicensed staff in finalising letter to INZ / adviser not professional or diligent & did not exercise due care / complaint upheld.
  22. LL v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 14 (12 March 2019) [PDF, 123 KB]

    Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / adviser had no direct contact with client / all communications made via Chinese migration company / staff’s work did not amount to clerical work / bulk of complainant’s instructions carried out by company / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / adviser’s misconduct serious / adviser facilitated unlicensed people to provide services only a licensed adviser could lawfully perform / no wilful violation of Act or Code / adviser did not personally engage with clients because it was against Chinese law / adviser mistakenly believed staff performing permitted clerical work / adviser retired & licence expired / adviser censured & prevented from reapplying for licence for 2 years.
  23. INZ (Calder) v Horan [2019] NZIACDT 13 (11 March 2019) [PDF, 274 KB]

    Unprofessional & disrespectful communications with INZ / adviser’s communications criticised INZ staff for being incompetent & threatened to raise complaint with government agency / INZ staff felt belittled, stressed, incompetent, upset & bullied by communications / adviser copied communications to lawyer & another adviser / INZ’s character concerns not brought to client’s attention / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl4a / adviser’s criticisms unprofessional & crossed disciplinary threshold / tone & text went beyond robust advocacy & amounted to unjustified personal attacks / communications not at upper end of being unprofessional / criticisms & threats unjustified but not offensive or intimidating in unlawful sense / adviser honestly believed clients wronged / adviser withheld information & failed to obtain client’s informed instructions / adviser breached client confidentiality / complaint upheld.
  24. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 12 (4 March 2019) [PDF, 261 KB]

    Rubber stamping / allowing unlicensed people to manage visa application process / long-term business visa / complainant client of Chinese migration company / adviser had no direct contact with client in accordance with Chinese law / entire relationship managed by company / business plan submitted to INZ not what complainant approved / whether company’s unlicensed staff performed immigration services / whether Chinese law qualifies adviser’s professional obligations / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / staff’s work not clerical work / unlikely staff did not provide immigration advice / staff undertook bulk of assistance & adviser allowed this / adviser misunderstood scope of clerical work but not what they were doing / in terms of obligations adviser’s client was complainant not company / Chinese law restrictions irrelevant to adviser’s obligations / complete abdication to personally engage with client / complaint upheld.
  25. Zhang & Cao v Chen [2019] NZIACDT 11 (1 March 2019) [PDF, 150 KB]

    Sanctions decision / incompetence / adviser failed to compile & file entrepreneur work & residence visa applications / complainants purchased motel but contract for sale lapsed / complainants provided business plan but plan never finalised / applications envisaged never made & complainants suffered significant loss / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / censure & training justified by level of adviser’s incompetence / incompetence not sufficient to prevent re-licensing / no other instances of incompetence / adviser acknowledged wrongdoing & offered refund / adviser not primary or real cause of complainants’ losses / Parliament only intended modest awards of compensation / unreasonable for complainants to rely on adviser solely for investment advice / adviser censured, ordered to complete training, pay penalty of $3000 & $17,500 refund of fees, plus any interest earned on $17,500.