Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.
Find out more about using the decision finder.
View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.
Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.
There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.
743 items matching your search terms
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 14 August 2012. Leave to appeal is granted. Is the Secretary for Education properly named as the sole respondent when the Employment Relations Authority investigates claims of the NZEI for declaratory and compliance orders for alleged breaches by the Secretary of the Primary Teachers’ Collective Agreement?
Decision Date: 13 August 2012. Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Decision Date: 13 August 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Decision Date: 13 August 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 final determination TRI 2011-100-000018/DBH 6321. Decision date 13 August 2012. See also the High Court Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 appeal decision CIV-2012-404-5495, and Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 48 costs decision.
Yee t/a Turangi Cabins & Holiday Park v Wallace - supplementary judgment of Judge A D Ford.
Matamata Industrial Machinery Imports Ltd v McAllister
AI v Secretary for Justice 10 August 2012 NZRA 000012
Application to amend decision.
Decision date: 10 August 2012.
Glenmavis Farm Partnership (2007) v Todd
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 9 August 2012. Appeal allowed. Upheld the CA's point that the employees could not bargain for redundancy compensation under s 69N because their collective agreement expressly excluded "redundancy payments". On the second issue of the effect of the employment agreement in this case, the SC reversed the CA’s finding that the exclusion of redundancy payments excluded the right to bargain for any other form of redundancy entitlement (reinstating the EC). The expression "redundancy entitlements" is defined in s 69B to include redundancy compensation, demonstrating that redundancy entitlements can take forms other than payment of monetary compensation (such as a right to retraining).
Tuapawa v AFFCO NZ Ltd - costs judgment of Judge A D Ford.
Tort / negligence / Animals Law Reform Act 1989 / Applicants’ vehicle driven by First Applicant collided with a bull owned by BG Trust on a state highway / Applicants claimed for the damage to their car / Held: BG trust’s actions were not negligent as they met the standard expected of a reasonably prudent farmer raising bulls / BG trust had taken a number of steps to minimise the likelihood of damage arising / altercation with mob of bulls was unexpected and unavoidable / BG trust could not have done anything further to prevent the escape / claim dismissed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Yu v Symbol Spreading Ltd
AK v Secretary for Justice 6 August 2012 NZRA 000013
Puhia v Ovation New Zealand Ltd
AJ v Secretary for Justice 4 August 2012 NZRA 000010
Decision date: 3 August 2012.
Decision Date: 03 August 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Decision date: 3 August 2012.
Decision Date: 03 August 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
03.08.2012 | Judge Harvey | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 289 | Partition, Exclusive use and occupation of partitioned land