Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.
Find out more about using the decision finder.
View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.
Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.
There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.
-
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT, 28 June 2012. Extension of time granted to seek leave to appeal from an EC decision finding NZCL liable to R for $12,880 for unjustifiable dismissal.Question of law on whether the facts found by the Employment Court judgment amount to a constructive dismissal on the basis of the duty of good faith, s 4(1A).Application for stay of execution of the judgment adjourned for further consideration on conditions.
-
Pottinger & Nine Dot consulting Ltd v Carew and Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd
-
Decision on Penalty. Date of Decision: 28 June 2012.
-
Standards Committee decision to prosecute / Confirmed on review.
-
Maritime Union of NZ v Posts of Auckland Ltd
-
Kelleher v Wiri Pacific Ltd
-
Maori Hill and Balmacewen Pharmacy Ltd
-
Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 29 quantum of costs TRI 2011-100-00080/DBH 6548. Decision date 25 June 2012. See also the Kapohe Family Trust v Cleland [2012] NZWHT Auckland 28 costs decision.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
22.06.2012 | Judge Harvey | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, sections 222, 239 | Election of trustees, Voting by ballot, Challenges to whakapapa, Venue for election
-
South Pacific Meats Ltd v Mohammed
-
Doran v Crest Commercial Cleaning Ltd
-
Decision Date: 20 June 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
20.06.2012 | Judge Savage | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 19 | Interim injunction - Ex parte
-
Decision Date:18 June 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Breach of Rule 5(7) Solicitors Trust Account Rules 1996 / Payment of fees to broker not authorised by client / Breach not such that disciplinary proceedings could have been commenced under Law Practitioners Act 1982. Section 351(1) LCA.
-
Substantive decision. Complaint dismissed.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
SC declined to uphold complaint that Practitioner had breached Rule 2.7 RCCC / LCRO agreed Practitioner's letter to Applicant was in robust terms, but did not breach rules of professional conduct / SC decision upheld.
-
Decision Date: 15 June 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
-
Suppression order.
-
Leave to appeal is granted, 15 June 2012. Did the Employment Court fail to apply orthodox interpretation principles by failing to take into account the words “unless otherwise agreed in writing” in the applicants’ employment contracts and by failing to consider what was implicit in those words against the background of past dealings and the obligations of good faith that arise in the context of an employment contract? If yes, was the respondent required periodically to review the percentage of the total remuneration package that was deemed to be superable salary and to adjust the percentage having regard to the material revealed by the review?