Search Results

1. TI(G)M v Hanning [2020] NZIACDT 1 (9 January 2020) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 (2) Alternatively, failing to verify that the complainant’s employment history and employment agreement met the visa requirements before filing the application and failing to address Immigration New Zealand

2. LCRO 111/2019 GH v SV (12 December 2019) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...or direction given. [100] It would provide fertile opportunity for parties to overburden the LCRO with a prolific raft of applications, if a Committee’s day to day administrative decisions were able to be the subject of review to the LCRO. [101] I am uncertain as to why the Committee failed to disclose the names of the Committee members, but in my view, requests to identify the lawyers who sat on a particular Committee, are properly directed to the Complaints Service. I have obse...

3. Chief Coroners Annual Report 2018-2019 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Rate per 100,000 people Year Asian Māori Pacific European and Other Number Rate* Number Rate* Number Rate* Number Rate* 2008-2009 10 2.82 95 16.81 26 9.81 400 13.00 2009-2010 22 6.21 105 18.58 31 11.69 383 12.45 2010-2011 19 5.36 101 17.87 22 8.30 416 13.52 2011-2012 19 5.36 132 23.34 31 11.69 365 11.24 2012-2013 28 7.90 105 18.58 24 9.05 384 12.48 2013-2014 22 4.67 108 18.06 26 8.81 373 12.96 2014-2015 16 3.40 130 21.74 27 9.15 391 13.58 2015-2016 39 8.28 129 21.5...

4. LCRO 221/2016 FN v SB (10 December 2019) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...it was under the fact the landlord was paying for this”. [100] Ms FN’s fee complaint is inextricably tied to her concern that initial work done was of minimal use to her. That was unfortunate but no blame can rest at Mr SB’s door. [101] I see no grounds which could persuade me to depart from the Committee’s decision to take no further action on the complaint, but for completeness, I record, for the reasons set out above, that I do not consider that the complaint made by...

5. Xu v Tian [2018] NZIACDT 42 (26 October 2018) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...informing Ms Xu she had been granted a visitor’s visa 2 Sections 49(3) & (4). 3 Section 50. 4 Section 51(1). 5 Section 53(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [39] These complaints may be dealt with together. [40] Ms Xu states that she was not aware that the first work visa had been declined or that she had been granted a visitor’s visa until Ms Tian told her o...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 33 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...silent as to how the Court is to go about exercising its challenge function, what material parties may appropriately put before the Court and what (if any) weight or level of deference is to be accorded to findings in the Authority. 4 Section 101(ab). 5 Section 144. 6 Section 156. 7 Section 179. 8 Section 214. 9 Section 214A. 10 Emphasis added. [9] In my view, and contrary to the defendant’s submission, the methodology issue is not answered by asking wheth...

7. [2023] NZIACDT 13 - OT v Ramos (24 April 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...immediately. She had advised the complainant and met him. 8 Section 51(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 10 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 9, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 [45] As for the allegation of dishonesty in making the Ministerial request, she can recall distinctly talking to the complainant and his wife about this option in her office. He consented. She show...

8. MOJ0504 Making a parenting plan workbook [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...

9. [2022] NZIACDT 24 - DA v Ji (20 September 2022) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...if operating in New Zealand, act in accordance with New Zealand law … 15 Section 50. 16 Section 51(1). 17 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 18 Z, above n 17, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 Conflicts of interest 5. Where a licensed immigration adviser is aware that there is a potential or actual conflict of interest relating to the client, including the existence of any financial or non-financia...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 20 – HT v Shaikh (27 August 2021) [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...(31 May 2021) was produced. He explains the new operational “CRM” system set up by Immigration Advice, including monitoring expiring visas and fees pending or refundable. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 [53] No party requests an oral hearing. ASSESSMENT [54] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent a...