Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 23 - FM v Yang (03 September 2024) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 9 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 8 From the Registrar [34] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (19 February 2024) with a paginated bundle of supporting documents. From the complainant [35] There are no su...

2. Firmin v Accident Compensation Act (Rehabilitation) [2025] NZACC 071 (1 May 2025) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...a side-by-side quad bike for Mr Firmin. Mr Firmin may be eligible for entitlements in respect of a personal injury for which 3 J v Accident Compensation Corporation [2017] NZCA 441. 4 Waaka v Accident Compensation Corporation [2003] NZACC 101. 11 he has cover.5 Included in entitlements is transport for independence, a key aspect of social rehabilitation.6 To be eligible for this entitlement, the Corporation must ensure that Mr Firmin is assessed as needing the transport...

3. [2025] NZEmpC 198 Rural Practice Ltd and Abdul Jabbar v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...v Preet PVT Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 143, [2016] ERNZ 514. 13 Labour Inspector v Daleson Investment Ltd [2019] NZEmpC 12, [2019] ERNZ 1 at [19]. 14 The penalties determination, above n 1, at [127]–[128]. 15 At [129]–[131]. 16 At [132]. 17 At [101]. to the sanctity of contract.18 The Authority Member found that Mr Abdul-Jabbar, knowingly disregarded the law governing employment and took advantage of the employees because they were not from New Zealand, but from Indonesia wh...

4. LCRO 147/2024 YK v XH (4 September 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...of his obligation (as it applied at the time) to promote and maintain proper standards of professionalism in his dealings.8 Decision [100] Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Act, the decision of the Committee is confirmed. Anonymised publication [101] Pursuant to s 206(4) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, I direct that this decision may be published but without any details that may directly or indirectly identify the parties, or any other person named in this decision. DATED...

5. [2025] NZIACDT 48 - INZ (Watson) v Santos - 15 September 2025 [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...the Authority on client engagement and rubber stamping. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 Z, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 8 ASSESSMENT [43] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 140 Gwilt v Briggs Stratton NZ Ltd [pdf, 188 KB]

   GWILT V BRIGGS & STRATTON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 140 [27 October 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 140 ARC 7/09 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GEOFFREY SCHOLEFIELD GWILT Plaintiff AND BRIGGS & STRATTON NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26-29 July and 10 August 2010 (5 days) (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Garry Pollak, cou

7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 49/09 Norske Skog Tasman Ltd v Manufacturing and Construction Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...(vi)). On the other, it is also to ensure that the role of the Authority and the Court, in resolving employment relationship problems, is to determine the rights and obligations of the parties rather than to fix terms and conditions of employment (s 101(d)). Further, it is to recognise that if problems in employment relationships are to be resolved promptly, expert problem-solving support, information and assistance need to be available at short notice to the parties to those relationship...

8. Far North District Council v Maihi - Okahu 3B2B2 (2014) 91 Taitokerau MB 284 (91 TTK 284) [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   91 Taitokerau MB 284 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20120014247 UNDER Section 183, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 3B2B2 Block BETWEEN FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant A20140010697 UNDER Section 215, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Okahu 1, 3B2B2A, 3B2B2C, 3B2B2D, 4A, 4B, 4D, 4C1, 4C2, 3A and 3B2A Blocks BETWEEN TE URI REIHANA-NGATOTE and DES

9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Schubach [2015] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...disputes which may arise from the retainers concluded by us on the 6th day of April 2009 and thereafter shall be Cologne (Germany). Therefore we hereby agree upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the Regional Court of Cologne Address: Luxemburger Str. 101, 50939 Köln, Germany, as the court of first instance. Dated at Christchurch this 8th day of November 2010 ..................................... ....................................... Client (Mr Schubach – Advoca...

10. Nicholls v Nicholls - WT Nicholls Trust [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 598 (2013 APPEAL 598) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...Decision.............................................................[77] Natural Justice and Substantive Orders........................................................... [85] The Predetermination and Bias Issue.............................................................[101] The Law on Bias............................................................................................. [106] Discussion and Reasons..............................................................................